Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691072›Full record

ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2025

Effects of central vs. peripheral attentional-oculomotor exercise on lexical processing.

Shaylyn Kress, Scott Caron, Josh Neudorf, Braedyn Borowsky, Ron Borowsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaylyn KressUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-2900
Scott CaronUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-4560-7097
Josh NeudorfSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-2900
Braedyn BorowskyUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-9312-3382
Ron BorowskyUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0002-4021

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Past research from our lab has suggested visual demands in video games serve to exercise attentional-oculomotor (A-O) processing in a manner beneficial to reading. However, testing the effect of video games on reading typically requires long timeframes (e.g., multiweek training or years of accumulated video game experience). The current study manipulated within-experiment peripheral and central demands to evaluate the effects of A-O exercise on task performance. Our study included two tasks: an orthographic lexical decision task (OLDT), designed to optimise orthographic lexical processing, and a novel graphic-based health bar decision task (HBDT). In Experiment 1, the stimuli were presented centrally in one block and peripherally in another block to manipulate A-O exercise. We observed greater improvements in the peripheral-first than the central-first group, particularly for the OLDT. In Experiments 2 and 3, we focused on the OLDT, with the HBDT serving as the A-O exercise task, and observed improvements in both centrally and peripherally trained participants. We additionally observed, through analyses of word and bigram frequency, a double dissociation, whereby increased target word frequency was associated with faster target reaction times and improved error rates, whereas increased foil bigram frequency was associated with slower foil reaction times and worse error rates. Taken together, the experiments demonstrate a mechanism beyond simple task learning that drives reading improvements, and A-O exercise, even if movements are small, appears to play a role in the improvements observed. We suggest future research should further develop this paradigm and examine its utility for reading remediation in dyslexia.

Indexed as

AttentionDecision MakingEye MovementsPattern Recognition, VisualReadingSemanticsVideo GamesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeVocabularyYoung Adultbigram frequencylexical decisionoculomotor processingorthographic lexical processingreadingsublexical processingVisual-spatial attentionword frequency

Identifiers

PMID39691072
PMCPMC12432289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.