ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024
Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient with Severe Coronary Artery Ectasia Followed Up for 10 Years: Implications of Anticoagulant Therapy.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between clinical features of isolated coronary artery ectasia and circulating levels of inflammatory markers.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) represents not only an anatomical variant but also a clinical constellation of coronary artery disease associated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There is no consensus on the antithrombotic treatment for patients with CEA. CASE REPORT A 34-year-old man with severe diffuse dilatation of the left main artery and left circumflex (LCX) proximal segment confirmed by coronary angiography (CAG) developed 2 acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs), due to occlusion of a dilated LCX segment with thrombus shadows, within a 9-year interval. Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention with aspiration thrombectomy failed to restore adequate blood flow at the first presentation of AMI, and the patient was eventually discharged with warfarin. After 15 months, however, he discontinued the medication on his own. After a 9-year interval, the patient experienced the second AMI, and CAG revealed occlusion of the LCX opening with thrombus shadows and collateral circulation visible from the distal segment of the right coronary artery to the circumflex branch. Thereafter, the patient began to take rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily. No chest pain or ACS events occurred during 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This case of 2 AMI events at the CAE segment caused by local thrombus formation suggests that lifetime systemic anticoagulation therapy for secondary prevention should be considered in such cases, and a novel oral anticoagulant may be a better choice for effectively preventing thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.