ArticleSubstance use & addiction journal2025
Staff and Providers' Perceptions of Patients' PrEP Candidacy, Acceptability, and Adherence in Methadone Clinic Settings.
Article in Substance use & addiction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople who use drugs and patients in substance use treatment may be placed at high risk for HIV due to mixing sex and drugs, potential engagement in sex work, and injection drug use. However, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adoption among these populations remains low. Methadone clinics, a main point of contact with the healthcare system for this population, are a missed opportunity to offer biomedical HIV prevention. Understanding provider and staff perceptions of patients' PrEP-related candidacy, acceptability, and adherence is a critical first step to informing PrEP implementation in substance use treatment settings.
methodsThirty semistructured interviews were conducted at 2 methadone clinics in Northern New Jersey between January and April 2019. Participants included methadone counselors, medical providers, front desk staff, intake coordinators, and other clinic staff members.
resultsThree major themes were identified: (1) provider and staff's perceptions of who would benefit most from PrEP, (2) perceptions of patients' acceptability of PrEP, and (3) perceptions of patients' ability to take a pill every day. Broadly, staff perceived younger patients to be better PrEP candidates than older patients, expressed cautious optimism that PrEP would be acceptable to their patient populations, and were mixed in terms of their perceptions of patients' ability to adhere to PrEP. Notably, staff largely did not mention patients who inject drugs as potential PrEP candidates, suggesting a missed opportunity.
conclusionTo promote PrEP implementation in methadone clinics, staff and providers should receive training around screening for PrEP eligibility in order to maximize the benefits of PrEP for various subpopulations, especially those who inject. Importantly, discussions around sexual behavior and injection drug use must be approached in an open, non-stigmatizing manner. These findings can be used to inform future interventions to integrate PrEP services into substance use treatment settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.