Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39690384›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Comparison of Intratumoral and Peritumoral Deep Learning, Radiomics, and Fusion Models for Predicting KRAS Gene Mutations in Rectal Cancer Based on Endorectal Ultrasound Imaging.

Yajiao Gan, Qiping Hu, Qingling Shen, Peng Lin, Qingfu Qian, Minling Zhuo, Ensheng Xue, Zhikui Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yajiao GanDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qiping HuDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qingling ShenDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Peng LinDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qingfu QianDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Minling ZhuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ensheng XueDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Zhikui ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China. jimchen2003@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

objectivesWe aimed at comparing intratumoral and peritumoral deep learning, radiomics, and fusion models in predicting KRAS mutations in rectal cancer using endorectal ultrasound imaging.

methodsThis study included 304 patients with rectal cancer from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. The patients were randomly divided into a training group (213 patients) and a test group (91 patients) at a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics and deep learning models were established using primary tumor and peritumoral images. In the optimally performing regions-of-interest, two fusion strategies, a feature-based and a decision-based model, were employed to build the fusion models. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was used to evaluate the significance of features in the optimal radiomics, deep learning, and fusion models. The performance of each model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsIn the test cohort, both the radiomics and deep learning models exhibited optimal performance with a 10-pixel patch extension, yielding AUC values of 0.824 and 0.856, respectively. The feature-based DLRexpand10_FB model attained the highest AUC (0.896) across all study sets. In addition, the DLRexpand10_FB model demonstrated excellent sensitivity, specificity, and DCA. SHAP analysis underscored the deep learning feature (DL_1) as the most significant factor in the hybrid model.

conclusionThe feature-based fusion model DLRexpand10_FB can be employed to predict KRAS gene mutations based on pretreatment endorectal ultrasound images of rectal cancer. The integration of peritumoral regions enhanced the predictive performance of both the radiomics and deep learning models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEndosonographyMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Rectal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiomicsROC CurveKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Deep learningK-ras genesRadiomicsRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID39690384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.