Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39690378›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2025

Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Critical Care Ultrasound use Among Providers in Neurocritical Units: A National Survey.

Melvin Parasram, Shamelia Y Loiseau, Thanujaa Subramaniam, Neha S Dangayach, Aarti Sarwal, Judy H Ch'ang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melvin ParasramDepartment of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, 520 East 70th Street Starr Pavilion, 607, NY, USA.
Shamelia Y LoiseauDepartment of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, 520 East 70th Street Starr Pavilion, 607, NY, USA.
Thanujaa SubramaniamDepartment of Neurology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Neha S DangayachDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Aarti SarwalDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Judy H Ch'angDepartment of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, 520 East 70th Street Starr Pavilion, 607, NY, USA. jhc9010@med.cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9017-9830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)/critical care ultrasound (CCU) use in medical and surgical intensive care units has surged over the last few decades. It is unclear if this has similarly translated in neurocritical care (NCC) units. We designed a survey to describe the current state of POCUS/CCU use and training among NCC providers.

methodsAn online 13-question survey was distributed nationally through newsletters and social media after endorsement by the Neurocritical Care Society. Participation was voluntary, and responses were anonymous. The survey queried respondent demographics, training, clinical use, confidence in POCUS/CCU, and barriers to POCUS/CCU use.

resultsOverall, 119 NCC providers responded to the survey. Most respondents were attending neurointensivists (52.1%) and had completed neurology residency training (62.2%). Approximately 23% of respondents did not have training in POCUS/CCU, and 71% of respondents had not completed POCUS/CCU board-certified training. Fifty-five percent of respondents used POCUS/CCU in their practice frequently, and 37% used it rarely on a weekly basis. Thirty-six percent and 42% of respondents felt moderately skilled at acquiring and interpreting POCUS/CCU images, respectively. Ultrasound guidance for procedures was the most common technique used by respondents. Most respondents felt that using ultrasound for volume status, procedural guidance, and evaluation of shock influenced clinical decision-making. Lack of confidence in interpreting data/imaging and comfort in performing POCUS/CCU were the most common barriers to ultrasound use. Respondents agreed with incorporation of POCUS/CCU training in NCC fellowship milestones and creating resources for credentialing providers in POCUS/CCU to increase use of POCUS/CCU in NCC.

conclusionsThis national survey indicated that POCUS/CCU is moderately used among NCC providers. However, more formalized and robust training in POCUS/CCU is needed for trainees and practitioners in NCC to enhance comfortability with using ultrasound for clinical assessments.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care UnitsNeurologyPoint-of-Care SystemsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonographyUnited StatesFellowshipNeurocritical carePoint-of-care ultrasoundSurveyUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.