ArticleNeurocritical care2025
Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Critical Care Ultrasound use Among Providers in Neurocritical Units: A National Survey.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture: A Narrative Review With Implications for Educators in the Clinical Neurosciences.Neurology. Education · 2026Review
- "Probe-ing" Deeper: Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture Training in Neurology.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)/critical care ultrasound (CCU) use in medical and surgical intensive care units has surged over the last few decades. It is unclear if this has similarly translated in neurocritical care (NCC) units. We designed a survey to describe the current state of POCUS/CCU use and training among NCC providers.
methodsAn online 13-question survey was distributed nationally through newsletters and social media after endorsement by the Neurocritical Care Society. Participation was voluntary, and responses were anonymous. The survey queried respondent demographics, training, clinical use, confidence in POCUS/CCU, and barriers to POCUS/CCU use.
resultsOverall, 119 NCC providers responded to the survey. Most respondents were attending neurointensivists (52.1%) and had completed neurology residency training (62.2%). Approximately 23% of respondents did not have training in POCUS/CCU, and 71% of respondents had not completed POCUS/CCU board-certified training. Fifty-five percent of respondents used POCUS/CCU in their practice frequently, and 37% used it rarely on a weekly basis. Thirty-six percent and 42% of respondents felt moderately skilled at acquiring and interpreting POCUS/CCU images, respectively. Ultrasound guidance for procedures was the most common technique used by respondents. Most respondents felt that using ultrasound for volume status, procedural guidance, and evaluation of shock influenced clinical decision-making. Lack of confidence in interpreting data/imaging and comfort in performing POCUS/CCU were the most common barriers to ultrasound use. Respondents agreed with incorporation of POCUS/CCU training in NCC fellowship milestones and creating resources for credentialing providers in POCUS/CCU to increase use of POCUS/CCU in NCC.
conclusionsThis national survey indicated that POCUS/CCU is moderately used among NCC providers. However, more formalized and robust training in POCUS/CCU is needed for trainees and practitioners in NCC to enhance comfortability with using ultrasound for clinical assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39690378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.