ArticleThe AAPS journal2024
Regulatory Considerations for Stability Studies of Co-Processed Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A co-processed active pharmaceutical ingredient (CP API) is the combination of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) with non-active component(s). This technology has been demonstrated to offer numerous benefits, including but not limited to improved API properties and stability. The infrastructure requirements are such that the manufacture of a CP API is typically best suited for an API facility. CP API has been regulated as either an API or as a drug product intermediate (DPI). This variability in the designation has led to ambiguities on the regulatory CMC expectations in the CP API including the stability of CP API and CP API containing products which, in turn has hampered the broader application of this technology in the pharmaceutical industry. This difference in designation also resulted in challenges to the lifecycle management of the regulatory documentation for the CMC information of the CP API.This white paper represents the proposals for the regulatory requirements on stability studies related to CP API and to drug product containing CP API by the CP API Working Group (WG) of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ). Additionally, considerations and the WG's recommendations on the stability studies of CP API from different manufacturing sites or processes and post-approval changes for product containing CP API are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39690373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.