Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39690355›Full record

ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2024

Advancements in Ocular Modelling and Simulations: Key Considerations and Case Studies.

Mohammed Shareef Khan, Aditya Murthy, Tausif Ahmed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammed Shareef KhanBiopharmaceutics - Biopharmaceutics and Bioequivalence, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad, India. mohammedshareefkhan@drreddys.com.
Aditya MurthyBiopharmaceutics - Biopharmaceutics and Bioequivalence, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad, India.
Tausif AhmedBiopharmaceutics and Bioanalytical - Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-6691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review paper discusses the key aspects of ocular biopharmaceutics, with emphasis on the crucial role played by ocular compartmental modelling and simulation in deciphering physiological conditions related to various eye diseases. It describes eye's intricate structure and function and the need for precise and targeted drug delivery systems to address prevalent eye conditions. The review categorizes and discusses various formulations employed in ocular drug delivery, delineating their respective advantages and limitations. Additionally, it probes the challenges inherent in diverse routes of drug administration for ocular therapies and provides insights into the complexities of achieving optimal drug concentrations at the target site within the eye. The central theme of this work is the ocular compartmental modelling and simulations. Hence, this works discusses on the nuanced understanding of physiological conditions within the eye, drug distribution, drug release kinetics, and key considerations for ocular compartmental modelling and simulations. By combining information from various sources, this review aims to serve as a comprehensive reference for researchers, clinicians, and pharmaceutical developers. It covers the multifaceted landscape of ocular biopharmaceutics and the transformative impact of modelling and simulation in optimizing ocular drug delivery strategies.

Indexed as

Administration, OphthalmicComputer SimulationDrug Delivery SystemsEyeEye DiseasesModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiopharmaceuticsDrug LiberationHumansOphthalmic SolutionsOphthalmic SolutionsGastroPlusOCAT modellingOcular drug deliveryOcular PBPK modelling (O-PBPK)Ocular pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.