Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39690315›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2025

Unravelling the art of developing skilled communication: a longitudinal qualitative research study in general practice training.

Michelle Verheijden, Angelique Timmerman, Dorien de Buck, Anique de Bruin, Valerie van den Eertwegh, Sandra van Dulmen, Geurt T J M Essers, Cees van der Vleuten, Esther Giroldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle VerheijdenDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.verheijden@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3528-0623
Angelique TimmermanDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8114-8802
Dorien de BuckDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Family, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anique de BruinDepartment of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5178-0287
Valerie van den EertweghDepartment of Skillslab, Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0079-4627
Sandra van DulmenNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1651-7544
Geurt T J M EssersIndependent Researcher, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cees van der VleutenDepartment of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6802-3119
Esther GiroldiDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3254-4849

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) 839130013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doctor-patient communication is a core competency in medical education, which requires learners to adapt their communication flexibly to each clinical encounter. Although conceptual learning models exist, information about how skilled communication develops over time is scant. This study aims to unpack this process of communication learning and to identify its facilitators. We conducted a longitudinal qualitative study employing a constructivist grounded theory approach in a General Practice training setting. Over a 6-month period, we closely monitored 8 first-year and 5 third-year trainees (n = 13) by means of clinical observations, stimulated recall interviews and audio diaries. In an iterative process of data collection and analysis, we triangulated these sources across trainees (horizontal analysis) and over time (vertical analysis) to identify how themes evolved. This analysis led us to the construction of a six-stage cyclic conceptual model during which trainees: (1) have an impactful experience; (2) become aware of own communication; (3) look for alternative communication behaviours; (4) experiment with new behaviours; (5) evaluate the effectiveness; and (6) internalise the new communication behaviours. Additionally, conditions were found to support learning and reflection. Becoming a skilled communicator seems to require a continuous approach, with repeated practice and reflection to adapt and internalise communication in the clinical encounter. Consequently, we recommend that trainees be supported with tailored feedback to strengthen their communication repertoire. Ideally, they should be guided by supervisors who serve as coaches in a safe learning environment with regular, planned learning activities.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunicationGeneral PracticePhysician-Patient RelationsAdultFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicLearningLongitudinal StudiesMaleQualitative ResearchDoctor-patient communicationLongitudinal qualitative researchMedical trainingSkilled communicationWorkplace learning

Identifiers

PMID39690315
PMCPMC12391227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.