Microalgae bioprospecting for the food industry: insights into the autotrophic biomass production and macromolecular accumulation of four microalgal species.

Georgia Papapanagiotou, Christina Samara, Paraskevi Psachoulia, Christos Chatzidoukas

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georgia PapapanagiotouLaboratory of Biochemical and Biotechnological Processes (LB²P), Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9591-9105

Christina SamaraLaboratory of Biochemical and Biotechnological Processes (LB²P), Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5464-5092

Paraskevi PsachouliaLaboratory of Biochemical and Biotechnological Processes (LB²P), Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece.

Christos ChatzidoukasLaboratory of Biochemical and Biotechnological Processes (LB²P), Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece. chatzido@auth.gr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9609-5125

Funding

European Regional Development Fund of the European Union T2EDK-02279Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation Τ2ΕDΚ-02279

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, four microalgal strains were evaluated for their biomass production capacity and macromolecule biosynthesis. These include three strains from the phylum Chlorophyta: Monoraphidium sp. LB2PC 0120, Stichococcus sp. LB2PC 0117, and Tetraselmis sp. LB2PC 0320, and one strain from the phylum Haptophyta: Isochrysis sp. LB2PC 0220. The experiments were conducted under typical laboratory-scale setups. Additionally, phylogenetic analysis based on the 18-28 S rRNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) was performed to validate the taxonomic identity of the strains. Each strain was exposed to four different cultivation conditions based on two levels of illumination intensity [25-(LI) and 50-(HI) µmol m

Indexed as

BiomassChlorophytaMicroalgaePhylogenyAutotrophic ProcessesBioprospectingFood IndustryHaptophytaNitrogenNitrogenIlluminationLipidMacromoleculesMonoraphidiumNitrogenProtein

Identifiers

PMID39690311

DOI10.1007/s11274-024-04229-y

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.