ReviewColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2024
Faecal immunochemical tests for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and multiple-threshold meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Review in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Positive Predictive Value of Symptoms for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- The TCN1 Paradox: Unraveling the Dual Role of Transcobalamin I in Colorectal Cancer-From Metabolic Regulation to Oncogenic Signaling.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Hologenomic analysis of rectal mucus sampling for detection of adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Faecal immunochemical tests for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and multiple-threshold meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimExtending faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT) to all primary care patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (CRC) could identify people who are likely to benefit from colonoscopy and facilitate earlier treatment. The aim of this work was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of FIT across different analysers at different thresholds, as a single test or in duplicate (dual FIT).
methodThis systematic review and meta-analysis searched 10 sources (December 2022). Diagnostic accuracy studies of HM-JACKarc, OC-Sensor, FOB Gold, QuikRead go, NS-Prime and four Immunodiagnostik (IDK) tests in primary care patients were included. Risk of bias was assessed (QUADAS-2). Statistical syntheses produced summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity at any chosen threshold for CRC, inflammatory bowel disease and advanced adenomas separately. Sensitivity analyses investigated reference standard and population type (high, low or all-risk). Subgroup analyses investigated patient characteristics (e.g. anaemia, age, sex, ethnicity).
resultsThirty-seven studies were included. At a threshold of 10 μg/g, pooled results for sensitivity and specificity (95% credible intervals) for CRC, respectively, were: HM-JACKarc (n = 16 studies) 89.5% (84.6%-93.4%) and 82.8% (75.2%-89.6%); OC-Sensor (n = 11 studies) 89.8% (85.9%-93.3%) and 77.6% (64.3%-88.6%); FOB Gold (n = 3 studies), 87.0% (67.3%-98.3%) and 88.4% (81.7%-94.2%). There were limited or no data on the other tests, dual FIT and relating to patient characteristics.
conclusionTest sensitivity at a threshold of 10 μg/g highlights a requirement for adequate safeguards in test-negative patients with ongoing symptoms. Further research is needed into the impact of patient characteristics and dual FIT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.