Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39690127›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2024

Surveillance of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms for progression to pseudomyxoma peritonei: Results from a structured surveillance programme.

Enda Hannan, Lorena Martin Roman, Lukas O'Brien, Anna Mueller, Oonagh Staunton, Conor Shields, John Aird, Jurgen Mulsow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surveillance of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms for progression to pseudomyxoma peritonei: Results from a structured surveillance programme.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Enda HannanThe National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1561-6177
Lorena Martin RomanThe National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Lukas O'BrienThe National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Anna MuellerThe National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7701-9664
Oonagh StauntonThe National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Conor ShieldsThe National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
John AirdDepartment of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Jurgen MulsowThe National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimLow-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) of the appendix is a rare tumour that can progress to pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). There is a lack of standardization of surveillance following resection of LAMN as the progression rate to PMP is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of progression following resection of LAMN to PMP in a structured surveillance programme.

methodData for all patients referred for LAMN surveillance from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. The surveillance regime consisted of annual CT and tumour markers for a 5-year period. Patients who progressed to PMP were identified.

resultsOf the patients enrolled in surveillance following appendicectomy and LAMN diagnosis (65.1% female, median age 56 years), 83 had completed at least 1 year of surveillance (median follow-up 24 months). Of these, 6% (n = 5) showed disease progression during follow-up. The median time to progression was 23 months. Survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in progression with regards to T staging (p = 0.39), margin positivity (p = 0.11) or appendiceal perforation (p = 0.26). No patients with Tis disease developed PMP. A statistically significant difference in progression was seen in patients with M1b staging (p = 0.021) and in those with mucin beyond the right iliac fossa at diagnosis (p = 0.04).

conclusionThe observed progression rate justifies the necessity of postappendicectomy surveillance in patients with LAMN, with the risk of progression being highest within the first 3 years of diagnosis. The described surveillance programme allows for early detection of subclinical progression to PMP.

Indexed as

cytoreductive surgeryhyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapylow‐grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasmpseudomyxoma peritoneisurveillance

Identifiers

PMID39690127
PMCPMC11683163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.