Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39689910›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2025

Examining socio-economic disparities among e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers in three Canadian jurisdictions.

Sarah MacDougall, Mark Asbridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Barriers to quittingPreventive medicine reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah MacDougallSchool of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2739-1895
Mark AsbridgeDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2168-6377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is well established that a gradient exists among cigarette smokers, such that smoking is more prevalent among individuals who are of lower socio-economic status (SES). In this study, we examined whether a similar SES gradient exists among electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) using youth and adults in three Canadian jurisdictions.

methodsA secondary analysis of data from Ontario, Quebec and Yukon respondents (n = 58,592) to the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey was conducted. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models explored SES measures: total and relative household income, and education level, separately on use of e-cigarettes or cigarettes in the past 30 days. Models adjusted for additional socio-demographic and psychosocial covariates.

resultsA significant inverse SES gradient existed for cigarette smoking based on education and income variables, with higher education and income associated with decreasing consumption in a stepwise manner. No SES gradient was observed for e-cigarettes. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsWhile a robust SES gradient was observed among cigarette smokers, no gradient for e-cigarette use was observed. Explanations for these findings may be linked to perceptions that e-cigarettes are healthier, have convenient designs and appealing flavours, and less stigmatised. As more becomes known about potential harms from e-cigarettes, effective interventions may be needed to prevent the emergence of a gradient that disproportionately affects those at lowest income and education levels. Continued monitoring of e-cigarette use patterns across SES groups is necessary for public health.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmokersSocial ClassVapingAdolescentAdultCanadaEducational StatusFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedOntarioCanadacigarettee‐cigarettesmokerssocio‐economic status

Identifiers

PMID39689910
PMCPMC11814357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.