ArticleDrug and alcohol review2025
Examining socio-economic disparities among e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers in three Canadian jurisdictions.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to quittingPreventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Examining socio-economic disparities among e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers in three Canadian jurisdictions.Drug and alcohol review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIt is well established that a gradient exists among cigarette smokers, such that smoking is more prevalent among individuals who are of lower socio-economic status (SES). In this study, we examined whether a similar SES gradient exists among electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) using youth and adults in three Canadian jurisdictions.
methodsA secondary analysis of data from Ontario, Quebec and Yukon respondents (n = 58,592) to the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey was conducted. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models explored SES measures: total and relative household income, and education level, separately on use of e-cigarettes or cigarettes in the past 30 days. Models adjusted for additional socio-demographic and psychosocial covariates.
resultsA significant inverse SES gradient existed for cigarette smoking based on education and income variables, with higher education and income associated with decreasing consumption in a stepwise manner. No SES gradient was observed for e-cigarettes. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsWhile a robust SES gradient was observed among cigarette smokers, no gradient for e-cigarette use was observed. Explanations for these findings may be linked to perceptions that e-cigarettes are healthier, have convenient designs and appealing flavours, and less stigmatised. As more becomes known about potential harms from e-cigarettes, effective interventions may be needed to prevent the emergence of a gradient that disproportionately affects those at lowest income and education levels. Continued monitoring of e-cigarette use patterns across SES groups is necessary for public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.