Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39689879›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Sex predicts response to novelty and problem-solving in a wild bird with female-biased sexual dimorphism.

Samara Danel, Nancy Rebout, Francesco Bonadonna, Dora Biro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samara DanelDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0233-2343
Nancy ReboutUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, Saint-Genès Champanelle 63122, France.
Francesco BonadonnaCEFE, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Dora BiroDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-6274

Funding

Fondation FyssenInstitut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wide range of animals, including a number of bird, fish, mammal and reptile species, show sex differences in cognitive tests. Hardly anything is known, however, about whether and how sex-specific non-cognitive factors (e.g. response to novelty) affect the expression of cognition in the wild. We used a series of learning and problem-solving tasks in wild breeding skuas, a species in which females are the larger sex (female-biased sexual size dimorphism). We also evaluated the birds' response to novelty (novel objects) before and after the tasks were administered. Both sexes performed equally well in learning (

Indexed as

Problem SolvingSex CharacteristicsAnimalsCognitionDiscrimination LearningFemaleMaleReversal Learningcognitionfield experimentneophobiasex differencessexual dimorphismskua

Identifiers

PMID39689879
PMCPMC11651883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.