ArticleOpen biology2024
The modified elevated gap interaction test: a novel paradigm to assess social preference.
Article in Open biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Del(5PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- The modified elevated gap interaction test: a novel paradigm to assess social preference.Open biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social deficits play a role in numerous psychiatric, neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders. Relating complex behaviour, such as social interaction, to brain activity remains one of the biggest goals and challenges in neuroscience. Availability of standardized tests that assess social preference is however, limited. Here, we present a novel behavioural paradigm that we developed to measure social behaviour, the modified elevated gap interaction test (MEGIT). In this test, animals are placed on one of two elevated platforms separated by a gap, in which they can engage in whisker interaction with either a conspecific or an object. This allows quantification of social preference in real interaction rather than just proximity and forms an ideal setup for social behaviour-related neuronal recordings. We provide a detailed description of the paradigm and its highly reliable, deep-learning based analysis, and show results obtained from wild-type animals as well as mouse models for disorders characterized by either hyposocial (autism spectrum disorder; ASD) or hypersocial (Williams Beuren syndrome; WBS) behaviour. Wild-type animals show a clear social preference. This preference is significantly smaller in an ASD mouse model, whereas it is larger in WBS mice. The results indicate that MEGIT is a sensitive and reliable test for detecting social phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.