ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2025
Protecting historically marginalized groups or targeted marketing? A computational analysis of individuals engaging with public and protected cigar-branded tweets.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Social Media Discourse on Cigars: Insights from Twitter/X Data.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSwisher Sweets, a leading brand of little cigars and cigarillos in the United States, switched its Twitter account to protected status, limiting access to its tweets. This study examines how the protected status of Swisher Sweets tweets influences post engagement, aiming to inform regulatory strategies for branded tobacco promotions on social media.
methodUsing natural language processing, we predicted the demographics of individuals replying to Swisher Sweets' public and protected tweets. Engagement with public versus protected tweets was compared using a Mann-Whitney U test, and a mixed-effects logistic regression assessed the likelihood of different demographics replying to each tweet type. Chi-square analyses examined word frequencies related to any flavor, concept flavors, and characterizing flavor in replies to public and protected tweets.
resultsOverall, 16 % of individuals replying to Swisher Sweets' tweets were predicted to be under 21, and 65 % were Black. No significant difference was found in average reply counts to public versus protected tweets (p = .78). Black individuals were 2.61 times more likely than White individuals to engage with protected tweets after the status change (OR = 2.61, 95 % CI [1.36, 5.06], p = .004). Replies to protected tweets contained more words related to any flavor (adjusted p < .001) and concept flavors (adjusted p < .001) compared to public tweet replies.
conclusionsOur study suggests that the protected status on Twitter was ineffective in preventing underage engagement with Swisher Sweets' branded tweets and may facilitate targeted marketing among Black individuals. IMPLICATIONS: More stringent age verification procedures and promotional regulatory measures are needed to prevent targeted tobacco brand marketing on social media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.