Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39689438›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025

Impact of ultrasound assisted pretreatment and drying methods on quality characteristics of underutilized vegetable purslane.

Tajali Assad, Zahida Naseem, Sajad Mohd Wani, Aisha Sultana, Iqra Bashir, Tawheed Amin, Fauzia Shafi, B S Dhekale, Imtiyaz Tahir Nazki, Imtiyaz Zargar and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tajali AssadDivision of Food Science and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
Zahida NaseemDivision of Food Science and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
Sajad Mohd WaniDivision of Food Science and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India. Electronic address: wanisajad82@gmail.com.
Aisha SultanaDivision of Food Science and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
Iqra BashirDivision of Food Science and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
Tawheed AminDivision of Food Science and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
Fauzia ShafiDivision of Basic Science and Humanities, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
B S DhekaleDivision of Agricultural Statistics, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
Imtiyaz Tahir NazkiDivision of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
Imtiyaz ZargarDivision of Food Science and Technology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
A Raouf MalikDivision of Fruit Science, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K 190025, India.
Tawfiq AlsulamiDepartment of Food Science & Nutrition, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Robert MugabiDepartment of Food Technology and Nutrition, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Gulzar Ahmad NayikMarwadi University Research Centre, Department of Microbiology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat 360003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was aimed to determine the effect of ultrasound pretreatment and different drying methods viz sun drying, solar drying, cabinet drying, vacuum drying, microwave assisted drying and freeze drying on physicochemical, phytochemical activity, rehydration ratio and drying time of the purslane. The purslane was ultrasonicated for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min following by drying. The ultrasound pretreatment (60 min) combined with freeze drying retained the highest antioxidants (95.59 %), phenolic content (7.85 mgGAE/100 g), total carotenoid content (99.74 mg/100 g), ascorbic acid (399.94 mg/100 g) and rehydration ratio (6.80). Moreover, the same combination revealed higher L and a* values when compared with other drying methods. However, the purslane pretreated with ultrasonication for 60 min and then dried via microwave took less time for drying. This study suggests that Ultrasound pretreatment (60 min) followed by freeze drying is recommended for preserving the nutritional and functional properties of purslane. It could be scaled up for commercial applications in the functional food and nutraceutical industries, where high-quality preservation is crucial.

Indexed as

DesiccationPortulacaSonicationUltrasonic WavesAntioxidantsFreeze DryingMicrowavesPhenolsAntioxidantsPhenolsAntioxidant activityDrying methodsPurslaneRehydration ratioUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39689438
PMCPMC11719406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.