Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2024
Insights and Trends in Open Note Access: Retrospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs of 2021, at least 4 out of every 5 hospitals offered patients access to clinical notes via a web-based patient portal, a number that is expected to grow because of the 21st Century Cures Act. There is limited data on how open note use may have evolved over time or which types of clinical interactions were viewed most in the outpatient setting.
objectiveThis study aims to analyze trends in outpatient open note access over time; characterize usage in terms of age, sex, and clinical interaction type; and assess the method of access to help uncover areas of improvement in patient engagement and identify further areas of research.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at Erie County Medical Center from November 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, to coincide with the time that open notes went live. Outpatient note access and account logs were downloaded from the portal and combined into a single dataset consisting of 18,384 note accesses by 4615 users, with column headings of the patient index, sex, age, note title that was accessed, clinical interaction type, time stamp of note creation, time stamp of access, and method of access (web vs mobile). A separate table was created with sex data for all 35,273 portal accounts. Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Power Query were used to combine and analyze the data.
resultsDuring the study period, 4615 portal users viewed 12,150 documents for a total of 18,384 times, averaging 2.6 notes per patient viewed 4 times. Only 13.1% (4615/35,273) of all portal inpatient and outpatient registrants viewed their outpatient notes. There was a female predominance in those who viewed notes (2926/4615, 63.4%; P<.001), while 56.8% (20,047/35,273) of all portal registrants were female. Users in their 30s and 50s accessed more notes than other age groups. The ratio of mobile-to-web access of notes tended to decrease as a function of increasing age, which was not observed in those aged ≥90 years. Notes regarding COVID-19 assessments were the most accessed among all clinical interactions (4725/12,150, 38.9%). Overall, the number of users accessing notes reached a maximum of 1968 before declining to 1027 by the end of the study period.
conclusionsOpen note access was largely dominated by COVID-19 assessments, and the number of users viewing their notes has declined over time as the pandemic subsided. Furthermore, female patients and those aged in their 30s as well as 50s viewed more notes than other groups. Finally, the percentage of notes viewed via a mobile device tended to decrease as a function of increasing age, showing that web-based access of open notes is an important modality for older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.