Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39689269›Full record

ReviewJCO oncology practice2025

Current Trends in Treating Malignant Pleural Effusion: Evidence, Guidelines, and Best Practice Recommendations.

Mohammed Munavvar, Uffe Bodtger, Andreas Carus, Rosa Cordovilla, Samir Naik, Antonieta Salud, José M Porcel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JCO oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammed MunavvarDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9493-3965
Uffe BodtgerDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark.
Andreas CarusDepartment of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9369-8628
Rosa CordovillaInterventional Pulmonology Unit, Pulmonology Department, Salamanca University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain.
Samir NaikDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, Essex, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4458-172X
Antonieta SaludDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7399-7484
José M PorcelPleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2734-8061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is common in individuals with cancer and typically reflects advanced disease. Most cases are symptomatic, with dyspnea and pain having a severe effect on the patient's quality of life (QOL). The management of MPE aims to relieve symptoms, improve QOL, prevent repeated pleural interventions, and minimize hospital admissions. Common treatments for MPE that provide symptomatic relief include thoracentesis, chemical (talc) pleurodesis, or indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs). Talc pleurodesis and IPCs are the mainstay of treatment but represent very different treatment strategies: talc pleurodesis is an inpatient procedure, whereas IPCs are an ambulatory strategy. Given their similar efficacy, treatment decisions in MPE are often determined by other factors, such as the patient's clinical characteristics, individual treatment goals, and preferences for hospital-based or home-based care. We provide a summary of the evidence for different interventions for treating MPE and compare recommendations from the major American, European, British, and Spanish guidelines regarding when to consider each treatment. We highlight specific challenging treatment scenarios and key clinical considerations that may influence treatment decisions for different patients. There are barriers to accessing and receiving evidence-based care. Patients with symptomatic MPE would benefit from early referral from oncology teams to pleural services. We provide best practice recommendations for optimal referral and coordination of care to ensure that patients receive maximum benefits from their interventions.

Indexed as

Pleural Effusion, MalignantHumansPleurodesisPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID39689269
PMCPMC12173166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.