ReviewJCO oncology practice2025
Current Trends in Treating Malignant Pleural Effusion: Evidence, Guidelines, and Best Practice Recommendations.
Review in JCO oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of patient positioning on the efficacy and safety of doxycycline pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion: a pilot randomized trial.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Trial
- Contemporary Pleural Drainage in Adult Practice: Image-Guided Techniques, Procedural Safety, Training Standards, and Malignant Pleural Effusion Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Timing of definitive pleural intervention within systemic anticancer therapy in malignant pleural effusion from high-response lung cancers: a retrospective single-center cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Turning Fluids into Data for Precision Oncology: A Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Approach to Malignant Pleural Effusions.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Talc pleurodesis versus indwelling pleural catheter for refractory pleural effusion: a prospective study of survival and complications.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Causative pathogens and clinical outcomes of pleural infection in patients without and with indwelling pleural catheters - a retrospective study from a Danish pleural clinic.European clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Re-evaluating breast malignant pleural effusion: toward evidence-based, precision-aligned care with organoids.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Mapping heterogeneity in the management of malignant pleural effusions with indwelling pleural catheters in Denmark - a national survey.European clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Assessment of pleural effusion using intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pilot study.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Emerging immunotherapeutic strategies for malignant serous effusions: current evidence and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Pigtail Catheter Drainage of Pleural Effusion in the Emergency Department: Effectiveness, Safety, and Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Research Priorities for Malignant Pleural Organization with Loculation and Failed Drainage.Cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is common in individuals with cancer and typically reflects advanced disease. Most cases are symptomatic, with dyspnea and pain having a severe effect on the patient's quality of life (QOL). The management of MPE aims to relieve symptoms, improve QOL, prevent repeated pleural interventions, and minimize hospital admissions. Common treatments for MPE that provide symptomatic relief include thoracentesis, chemical (talc) pleurodesis, or indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs). Talc pleurodesis and IPCs are the mainstay of treatment but represent very different treatment strategies: talc pleurodesis is an inpatient procedure, whereas IPCs are an ambulatory strategy. Given their similar efficacy, treatment decisions in MPE are often determined by other factors, such as the patient's clinical characteristics, individual treatment goals, and preferences for hospital-based or home-based care. We provide a summary of the evidence for different interventions for treating MPE and compare recommendations from the major American, European, British, and Spanish guidelines regarding when to consider each treatment. We highlight specific challenging treatment scenarios and key clinical considerations that may influence treatment decisions for different patients. There are barriers to accessing and receiving evidence-based care. Patients with symptomatic MPE would benefit from early referral from oncology teams to pleural services. We provide best practice recommendations for optimal referral and coordination of care to ensure that patients receive maximum benefits from their interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.