Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39689248›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2025

Collective wellbeing sacrifices versus superior ego - perspectives on adherence to COVID-19 recommendations in Stockholm, Sweden.

Dan Sigvardsson, Marlene Makenzius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dan SigvardssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0008-6296-2439
Marlene MakenziusDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6014-6296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Sweden adopted a recommendation-based approach rather than strict lockdowns. This approach relies on public willingness to adhere to guidelines and motivations for prosocial behaviour. This study aimed to explore the motivations behind adherence or non-adherence to COVID-19 recommendations in Sweden. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2022 with 20 participants aged 26 to 63, all residing and working in Stockholm. The interviews were conducted via online platforms, Teams and Zoom, transcribed and analysed using content analysis. The analysis yielded two overarching themes that motivated adherence or non-adherence,

Indexed as

COVID-19MotivationSARS-CoV-2AdultFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSwedenAdherenceCOVID-19prosocialrecommendationssocial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID39689248
PMCPMC11654041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.