ArticlePloS one2024
Risk factors of healthcare-associated infection among healthcare workers in intensive care units: A multicenter cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Safety Culture Among Healthcare Professionals in Jeddah First Health Cluster:Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Pioneering infection prevention and control education through simulation-based learning: impact on knowledge and skills in nursing students in Tunisia.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Effects of Expanding Infection Control Team Functions on Device-Associated HAIs: A Leadership-Oriented Intervention Study (2017-2024).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing organizational commitment among healthcare employees in the Asir Health Cluster, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a major global health threat, leading to higher morbidity and mortality, longer hospital stays, and increased healthcare expenses. Intensive care units (ICUs) present a particularly high risk of developing HAIs. This study aims to examine the risk factors of HAIs among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the ICUs of selected public hospitals.
methodsWe employed a cross-sectional design using an online survey. Respondents were randomly selected from seven large public hospitals located in different areas of Riyadh, the capital city of Saudi Arabia. Data collection was conducted between November 1st to 15th, 2023. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine previous exposure to HAIs as the response variable and selected predictors.
resultsA total of 600 HCWs participated in the study (response rate 88.2%). Among the study HCWs, 75.1% were female, with nurses making up 50% of the sample. Of the respondents, 78% had at least a year's experience, 71% had applied infection prevention and control (IPC) training from the infection control department, and 93% reported they had good knowledge about infection control. The level of knowledge of IPC (OR = 0.9, p < 0.05) and applied IPC training (0.1, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with a lower risk of HAIs. Additionally, a higher risk of HAIs was associated with HCWs years of clinical experience (p < 0.001).
conclusionOverall, the findings indicated that HCWs who have poor knowledge of IPC, who reported no previous IPC applied training, and who have more years of clinical work experience have a greater risk of HAIs. Thus, legislators and Health officials should prioritize the prevention of infections linked to healthcare, paying particular attention to tailored and applied IPC initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.