ArticlePloS one2024
The internet of things deployed for occupational health and safety purposes: A qualitative study of opportunities and ethical issues.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Behind the good of digital tools for occupational safety and health: a scoping review of ethical issues surrounding the use of the internet of things.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The deployment of the Internet of Things (IoT) technology (connected devices enabling algorithmic analysis of behaviour and individualized feedback) has been growing increasingly over the last decades, including in the workplace where they can serve occupational safety and health (OSH) purposes. However, although the IoT is deployed for good aims, the use of these devices raises numerous ethical issues which have had little literature specifically dedicated to them. To fill this gap, we have investigated the ethical views of key stakeholders on the deployment of IoT for OSH. We conducted a focus group and semi-structured interviews including 24 stakeholders and analysed transcripts with an open coding method. Participants were favourably disposed towards the use of some versions of IoT (posture-tracker chair, step-tracker watch), but rejected other devices (sound-tracker on computer). They highlighted an important number of ethical issues which could be grouped into five overarching categories: goal relevance, adverse side effects, role of employees, data process, and vagueness. Their inputs were remarkably coherent with the issues highlighted in the academic literature. They also felt quite disenchanted and shed a stark light on the lack of information at the disposal of stakeholders in the front line to assess such technology. Our results provide important ground material on which to base necessary and still-awaited guidelines and regulation instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.