Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39689129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Structured tailored rehabilitation after hip fragility fracture: The 'Stratify' feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial protocol.

Katie J Sheehan, Stefanny Guerra, Salma Ayis, Aicha Goubar, Nadine E Foster, Finbarr C Martin, Emma Godfrey, Ian D Cameron, Celia L Gregson, Nicola E Walsh and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06014554 (Structured Tailored Rehabilitation After Hip Fragility Fracture), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06014554 naunknown statusnot on this map

Structured Tailored Rehabilitation After Hip Fragility Fracture: The 'STRATIFY' Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsHip FracturesArmsLow-risk subgroup, Medium-risk subgroup, High-risk subgroup, Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Katie J SheehanBone & Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5325-7454
Stefanny GuerraBone & Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Salma AyisDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Health, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aicha GoubarDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Health, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nadine E FosterSurgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia.
Finbarr C MartinDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Health, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emma GodfreyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Health, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8995-9653
Ian D CameronJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Celia L GregsonMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Nicola E WalshCentre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Anna Ferguson MontaguePublic and Patient Involvement Member Representative from Trauma Rehabilitation (Orthopaedic) for Older People (TROOP), London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca EdwardsGuy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jodie AdamsGuy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Gareth D JonesGuy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5516-9418
Jamie GibsonGuy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1135-3613
Catherine SackleySchool of Health Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Julie WhitneyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Health, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship MR/S032819/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRehabilitation in hospital is effective in reducing mortality after hip fracture. However, there is uncertainty over optimal in-hospital rehabilitation treatment ingredients, and the generalizability of trial findings to subgroups of patients systematically excluded from previous trials. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial which aims to assess the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of adding a stratified care intervention to usual care designed to improve outcomes of acute rehabilitation for all older adults after hip fracture.

methodsThis is a protocol for a single site, feasibility and pilot, pragmatic, parallel group (allocation ratio 1:1) randomised controlled assessor-blind STRATIFY trial (Structured Tailored Rehabilitation AfTer HIp FragilitY Fracture). Adults aged 60 years or more, surgically treated for hip fracture following low energy trauma (fragility fracture), who are willing to provide consent or by consultee declaration (depending on capacity), are eligible. Individuals who experienced in-hospital hip fracture will be excluded. Screening, consent/assent, baseline assessment (demographics, patient reported outcome measures or PROMs [health related quality of life, activities of daily living, pain, falls related self-efficacy], and resource use), and randomization will take place within the first four days post-admission. Participants will then be offered usual care, or usual care plus STRATIFY intervention during their hospital stay. The STRATIFY intervention includes 1) a web-based algorithm to allocate participants to low- medium- or high-risk subgroups; and 2) matched interventions depending on subgroup allocation. The low-risk subgroup will be offered a self-management review, training in advocacy, and a self-managed exercise programme with support for progression, in addition to usual care (1-hour 40 minutes therapist time above usual care). The medium-risk subgroup will be offered education, a goal-orientated mobility programme (with carer training, as available and following carer consent), and early enhanced discharge planning, in addition to usual care (estimated 2-hours 15 minutes therapist time above usual care). The high-risk subgroup will be offered education, enhanced assessment, orientation, and a goal-orientated activities of daily living programme (with carer training, as available and following carer consent), in addition to usual care (estimated 2-hours 45minutes therapist time above usual care). All STRATIFY subgroup treatment interventions are specified using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) for treatment theory development and replication. Follow-up PROM data collection, RESOURCE USE alongside readmissions and mortality, will be collected on discharge and 12-weeks post-randomisation. Intervention acceptability will be determined by semi-structured interviews with participants, carers, and therapists at the end of the intervention. DISSEMINATION: The trial findings will be disseminated to patients and the public, health professionals and researchers through publications, presentations and social media channels.

trial registrationThe trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06014554).

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesHip FracturesQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39689129
PMCPMC11651604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.