Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39689123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Forbidden, yet common: Female genital cutting among the Oromo in central Ethiopia.

Zerihun Mekuria Tesfaye, Dejene Gemechu Chala, Jira Mekonnen Choroke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zerihun Mekuria TesfayeDepartment of Social Anthropology, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Dejene Gemechu ChalaDepartment of Social Anthropology, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-1378-4345
Jira Mekonnen ChorokeDepartment of Social Anthropology, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article answers the question 'why female genital cutting (FGC) has remained common among the Oromo in central Ethiopia when it is legally forbidden.' Primary data for this article were generated through key informant interviews and focus group discussions, while secondary data were gathered from online and archives in the research site. Our findings indicate that the government tries to use legislative and health approaches in its efforts to terminate FGC. However, it has survived over time because of the strong resistance that the community in the research area wages against the intervention efforts. The very reason behind the resistance to end FGC is a patriarchal value that shapes gender relations, women's sexuality, and behaviors. The community gives precedence to the socio-cultural values of FGC over its criminalization and the stated negative health effects. Paradoxically, women are at the forefront in promoting FGC, for they believe that FGC shapes the sexual behavior of the girls and defines the gender identity of their daughters. The women take the prime responsibility to raise and mold the girls into ideal female behavior.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleAdolescentAdultEthiopiaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedSexual BehaviorYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39689123
PMCPMC11651596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.