ArticlePloS one2024
An improved biometric stress monitoring solution for working employees using heart rate variability data and Capsule Network model.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dose-dependent cardiac autonomic dysregulation under classroom crowding: heart rate variability analysis and machine learning classification.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biometric stress monitoring has become a critical area of research in understanding and managing health problems resulting from stress. One of the fields that emerged in this area is biometric stress monitoring, which provides continuous or real-time information about different anxiety levels among people by analyzing physiological signals and behavioral data. In this paper, we propose a new approach based on the CapsNets model for continuously monitoring psychophysiological stress. In the new model, streams of biometric data, including physiological signals and behavioral patterns, are taken up for analysis. In testing using the Swell multiclass dataset, it performed with an accuracy of 92.76%. Further testing of the WESAD dataset reveals an even better accuracy at 96.76%. The accuracy obtained for binary classification of stress and no stress class is applied to the Swell dataset, where this model obtained an outstanding accuracy of 98.52% in this study and on WESAD, 99.82%. Comparative analysis with other state-of-the-art models underlines the superior performance; it achieves better results than all of its competitors. The developed model is then rigorously subjected to 5-fold cross-validation, which proved very significant and proved that the proposed model could be effective and efficient in biometric stress monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.