ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025
The Active Ingredients of Semantic Naming Treatment: Evidence From Mandarin-English Bilingual Adults With Aphasia.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating the Complexity of Bilingual Aphasia: Current Insights and Future Directions.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFollowing the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) framework, the current study investigated the active ingredients in the modified semantic feature analysis (mSFA) targeting either noun or verb retrieval in Mandarin-English bilingual adults with aphasia (BWA).
methodTwelve Mandarin-English BWA completed mSFA treatment for nouns and verbs. Eight of them completed both noun and verb treatment, while four completed either type of treatment. Performance in each step was scored and analyzed using mixed-effects modeling. Then, regression was performed to estimate the effect of treatment performance on the accuracy of naming probes for trained and semantically related items in both treated and untreated languages.
resultsParticipants demonstrated significant improvements in all treatment steps during both noun and verb treatment, yet the effect varied depending on the trained word category and treatment language. Moreover, all treatment components contributed significantly to the treatment outcomes. Better treatment performance in spontaneous naming was significantly associated with improved naming accuracy of the trained items in noun mSFA, while better treatment performance in spontaneous naming, feature analysis, and sentence production was significantly associated with enhanced naming of the semantically related untrained items in noun mSFA. Importantly, performance in all treatment steps of both noun and verb mSFA significantly predicted naming accuracy in the untreated language.
conclusionFindings provided strong evidence of the potential active ingredients of semantic-based naming therapy in Mandarin-English BWA and highlighted the importance of examining treatment ingredients within the RTSS framework. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28003292.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.