Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39689035›Full record

ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2025

Review and experimental comparison of speckle-tracking algorithms for X-ray phase contrast imaging.

Rafael Celestre, Laurène Quénot, Christopher Ninham, Emmanuel Brun, Luca Fardin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafael CelestreSynchrotron SOLEIL, L'Orme des Merisiers, Dèpartementale 128, Saint-Aubin, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9398-4114
Laurène QuénotUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA7 STROBE, Grenoble, France.
Christopher NinhamUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA7 STROBE, Grenoble, France.
Emmanuel BrunUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA7 STROBE, Grenoble, France.
Luca FardinUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, UA7 STROBE, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray speckles have been used in a wide range of experiments, including imaging (and tomography), wavefront sensing, spatial coherence measurements, X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy and ptychography. In this review and experimental comparison, we focus on using X-ray near-field speckle grains as wavefront markers and numerical methods for retrieving the phase information they contain. We present the most common tracking methods, introducing the existing algorithms with their specifications and comparing their performances under various experimental conditions. This comparison includes applications to different types of samples: phantoms for quantitative analysis and complex samples for assessing image quality. Our goal is to unify concepts from several speckle tracking methods using consistent terminology and equation formalism, while keeping the discussion didactic and accessible to a broad audience.

Indexed as

speckle trackingX-ray phase contrast

Identifiers

PMID39689035
PMCPMC11708844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.