ArticleJournal of vision2024
Sensory feedback modulates Weber's law of both perception and action.
Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Weber's law states that estimation noise is proportional to stimulus intensity. Although this holds in perception, it appears absent in visually guided actions where response variability does not scale with object size. This discrepancy is often attributed to dissociated visual processing for perception and action. Here, we explore an alternative explanation: It is the influence of sensory feedback on motor output that causes this apparent violation. Our research investigated response variability across repeated grasps relative to object size and found that the variability pattern is contingent on sensory feedback. Pantomime grasps with neither online visual feedback nor final haptic feedback showed variability that scaled with object size, as expected by Weber's law. However, this scaling diminished when sensory feedback was available, either directly present in the movement (Experiment 1) or in adjacent movements in the same block (Experiment 2). Moreover, a simple visual cue indicating performance error similarly reduced the scaling of variability with object size in manual size estimates, the perceptual counterpart of grasping responses (Experiment 3). These results support the hypothesis that sensory feedback modulates motor responses and their associated variability across both action and perception tasks. Post hoc analyses indicated that the reduced scaling of response variability with object size could be due to changes in motor mapping, the process mapping visual size estimates to motor outputs. Consequently, the absence of Weber's law in action responses might not indicate distinct visual processing but rather adaptive changes in motor strategies based on sensory feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.