Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688792›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025

Association Between Patient-Reported Pain and Remission or Low Disease Activity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from RA-BE-REAL Prospective Observational Study.

Peter C Taylor, Walid Fakhouri, Samuel Ogwu, Ewa Haladyj, Inmaculada de la Torre, Bruno Fautrel, Rieke Alten, Peter Nash, Eugen Feist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter C TaylorBotnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rhematology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. peter.taylor@kennedy.ox.ac.uk.
Walid FakhouriEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Samuel OgwuEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ewa HaladyjEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Inmaculada de la TorreEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Bruno FautrelDepartment of Rheumatology, Assistance Publique Hospitaux de Paris, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Rieke AltenDepartment of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Schlosspark Klinik, Berlin, Germany.
Peter NashSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Eugen FeistDepartment of Rheumatology, Helios Clinic, Sophie-Von-Boetticher-Straße 1, 39245, Vogelsang Gommern, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aim to assess the association of patient-reported pain and remission or low disease activity (LDA) at 3 months (M) in patients receiving baricitinib or other treatments in RA-BE-REAL.

methodsRA-BE-REAL reports on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were prescribed, for the first time, baricitinib (cohort A) or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (cohort B-TNFi) or any other mode of action (OMA) (cohort B-OMA). Pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) and clinically meaningful pain improvement thresholds of ≥ 30%, ≥ 50% and ≥ 70% from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 M.

resultsAt 3 M, the mean change from baseline (CFB) pain VAS of patients in remission/LDA was - 32.6 mm (cohort A), - 27.3 mm (cohort B-TNFi) and - 28.0 mm (cohort B-OMA). Almost half the patients who were in remission/LDA receiving baricitinib achieved ≥ 70% pain relief. At 3 M, the proportion of patients in remission/LDA with pain VAS ≤ 20 mm was 62.1% (cohort A), 55.0% (cohort B-TNFi) and 55.6% (cohort B-OMA), while for those not in remission/LDA, it was 8.5% and 8.7% (cohort A and B-TNFi, respectively) and 5.3% (B-OMA). More patients on baricitinib achieved pain improvement in all analyzed thresholds than patients in cohort B-TNFi and B-OMA at 3 M. At 24 M, - 26.2 mm (cohort A), - 20.8 mm (cohort B-TNFi) and - 16.0 mm (cohort B-OMA) mean CFBs in pain measurement were observed. For baricitinib and the other treatments, residual pain decreased with achievement of remission/LDA and was sustained up to 24 M.

conclusionsPatients in remission/LDA receiving baricitinib are more likely to achieve pain control than patients receiving TNFi/OMA.

Indexed as

BaricitinibLow disease activityRemissionRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID39688792
PMCPMC11751266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.