Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688744›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Robot-assisted microsurgery: a single-center experience of 100 cases.

F Struebing, A Boecker, F Vollbach, J Weigel, U Kneser, A K Bigdeli, E Gazyakan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F StruebingDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg University, Ludwig Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
A BoeckerDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg University, Ludwig Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
F VollbachDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg University, Ludwig Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
J WeigelDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg University, Ludwig Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
U KneserDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg University, Ludwig Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
A K Bigdeli *Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg University, Ludwig Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
E Gazyakan *Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg University, Ludwig Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany. emre.gazyakan@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoption of robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) is a cutting-edge advancement in the realm of microsurgery. The Symani Surgical System is CE approved and has recently gained FDA approval. It provides tremor elimination, motion scaling and improved ergonomics. This study reports on the first 100 consecutive cases of RAMS at a high-volume academic center, representing the largest series to date, and assesses its clinical application and efficacy. A prospective database captured all RAMS cases at a single institution between February 2023 and April 2024. Parameters recorded included patient demographics, surgical details, and outcomes. Surgeons completed a comprehensive 12 h training program to ensure adept use of the system. One-hundred patients with a mean age of 54 yrs were identified, predominantly male (66%). RAMS was performed in a wide range of procedures, notably free flaps (73%), nerve surgery (20%), and lymphovenous anastomoses (LVA) (6%). 159 anastomoses and coaptations were performed. Major complications occurred in 12 cases (12%). There were two complete free flap losses (2.7% of free flaps) and one partial free flap loss (1.4%). LVAs had significantly longer times per stitch than other types of anastomoses (p < 0.01). RAMS presents a viable alternative to traditional microsurgery with a commendable safety profile, marked by a 3% conversion rate to conventional techniques and complication rates that align with current literature. While challenges such as longer anastomosis times and higher costs exist, the results affirm the feasibility of RAMS in a high-volume microsurgical center.

Indexed as

MicrosurgeryRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleFree Tissue FlapsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFree flap surgeryPlastic surgeryReconstructive surgeryRobot-assisted microsurgeryRobotic microsurgerySupermicrosurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.