ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024
Robot-assisted microsurgery: a single-center experience of 100 cases.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dedicated Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery Platforms in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.Microsurgery · 2026Pooled it
- The application of robot-assisted microsurgery in orthoplastic surgery.Innovative surgical sciences · 2026Article
- Advancements in robotic assisted microsurgery: Exploring the MUSA robot in reconstructive microsurgical and supermicrosurgical procedures.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Surgical Outcomes in Non-Transected and Partially Transected Peripheral Nerve Injuries.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Exploring the Use of Robotics in Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery: A Comprehensive Perspective.Cureus · 2025Review
- Use of the Symani® microscopic surgical robot in hand surgery and operating room setup.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Robot-Assisted Microsurgery Has a Steeper Learning Curve in Microsurgical Novices.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adoption of robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) is a cutting-edge advancement in the realm of microsurgery. The Symani Surgical System is CE approved and has recently gained FDA approval. It provides tremor elimination, motion scaling and improved ergonomics. This study reports on the first 100 consecutive cases of RAMS at a high-volume academic center, representing the largest series to date, and assesses its clinical application and efficacy. A prospective database captured all RAMS cases at a single institution between February 2023 and April 2024. Parameters recorded included patient demographics, surgical details, and outcomes. Surgeons completed a comprehensive 12 h training program to ensure adept use of the system. One-hundred patients with a mean age of 54 yrs were identified, predominantly male (66%). RAMS was performed in a wide range of procedures, notably free flaps (73%), nerve surgery (20%), and lymphovenous anastomoses (LVA) (6%). 159 anastomoses and coaptations were performed. Major complications occurred in 12 cases (12%). There were two complete free flap losses (2.7% of free flaps) and one partial free flap loss (1.4%). LVAs had significantly longer times per stitch than other types of anastomoses (p < 0.01). RAMS presents a viable alternative to traditional microsurgery with a commendable safety profile, marked by a 3% conversion rate to conventional techniques and complication rates that align with current literature. While challenges such as longer anastomosis times and higher costs exist, the results affirm the feasibility of RAMS in a high-volume microsurgical center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39688744What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.