Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688727›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2025

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Clinical Validation of TIME Criteria to Detect Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults: Methodological Report from the TIME International Study Group.

Gulistan Bahat, Tugba Erdogan, Busra Can, Serdar Ozkok, Birkan Ilhan, Asli Tufan, Mehmet Akif Karan, Athanase Benetos, Antonio Cherubini, Michael Drey and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Gulistan BahatDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Çapa, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey. gbahatozturk@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6039-5866
Tugba ErdoganDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Çapa, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
Busra CanDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Marmara University Medical School, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serdar OzkokDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Çapa, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
Birkan IlhanDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Liv Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Asli TufanDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Marmara University Medical School, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Akif KaranDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Çapa, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
Athanase BenetosPôle « Maladies du Vieillissement, Gérontologie et Soins Palliatifs », and INSERM DCAC u1116, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, 54000, Nancy, France.
Antonio CherubiniGeriatria, Accettazione Geriatrica e Centro di Ricerca Per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Michael DreyDepartment of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Doron GarfinkelCenter for Appropriate Medication Use, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Jerzy GąsowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, University Hospital, 2 Jakubowskiego St., Building I, 5th Floor, 30-688, Kraków, Poland.
Anna Renom-GuiterasDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Marina KotsaniPôle « Maladies du Vieillissement, Gérontologie et Soins Palliatifs », Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France.
Lisa McCarthyLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Graziano OnderFondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Farhad PazanEhemals Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Karolina PiotrowiczDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, University Hospital, 2 Jakubowskiego St., Building I, 5th Floor, 30-688, Kraków, Poland.
Paula RochonWomen's Age Lab and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Georg RuppeEuropean Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS), Vienna, Austria.
Wade ThompsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Eva TopinkovaDepartment of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nathalie van der VeldeInternal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mirko PetrovicDepartment of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious explicit screening tools, developed mostly in central Europe and the USA, assist clinicians in optimizing medication use for older adults. The Turkish Inappropriate Medication use in oldEr adults (TIME) criteria set, primarily based on the STOPP/START criteria set, is a current explicit tool originally developed for Eastern Europe and subsequently validated for broader use in Central European settings. Reviewed every three months to align with the latest scientific literature, it is one of the most up-to-date tools available. The tool is accessible via a free mobile app and website platforms, ensuring convenience for clinicians and timely integration of updates as needed. Healthcare providers often prefer to use their native language in medical practice, highlighting the need for prescribing tools to be translated and adapted into multiple languages to promote optimal medication practices.

objectiveTo describe the protocol for cross-cultural and language validation of the TIME criteria in various commonly used languages and to outline its protocol for clinical validation across different healthcare settings.

methodsThe TIME International Study Group comprised 24 geriatric pharmacotherapy experts from 12 countries. In selecting the framework for the study, we reviewed the steps and outcomes from previous research on cross-cultural adaptations and clinical validations of explicit tools. Assessment tools were selected based on both their validity in accurately addressing the relevant issues and their feasibility for practical implementation. The drafted methodology paper was circulated among the study group members for feedback and revisions leading to a final consensus.

resultsThe research methodology consists of two phases. Cross-cultural adaptation/language validation phase follows the 8-step approach recommended by World Health Organization. This phase allows regions or countries to make modifications to existing criteria or introduce new adjustments based on local prescribing practices and available medications, as long as these adjustments are supported by current scientific evidence. The second phase involves the clinical validation, where participants will be randomized into two groups. The control group will receive standard care, while the intervention group will have their treatment evaluated by clinicians who will review the TIME criteria and consider its recommendations. A variety of patient outcomes (i.e., number of hospital admissions, quality of life, number of regular medications [including over the counter medications], geriatric syndromes and mortality) in different healthcare settings will be investigated.

conclusionThe outputs of this methodological report are expected to promote broader adoption of the TIME criteria. Studies building on this work are anticipated to enhance the identification and management of inappropriate medication use and contribute to improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonInappropriate PrescribingPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedHumans

Identifiers

PMID39688727
PMCPMC13139231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.