Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688716›Full record

SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2024

Machine learning for predicting post-operative outcomes in meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Siraj Y Abualnaja, James S Morris, Hamza Rashid, William H Cook, Adel E Helmy

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siraj Y AbualnajaPeterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4093-0996
James S MorrisUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5040-9483
Hamza RashidPeterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4440-124X
William H CookDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. whc35@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7699-3342
Adel E HelmyDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0531-0556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMeningiomas are the most common primary brain tumour and account for over one-third of cases. Traditionally, estimations of morbidity and mortality following surgical resection have depended on subjective assessments of various factors, including tumour volume, location, WHO grade, extent of resection (Simpson grade) and pre-existing co-morbidities, an approach fraught with subjective variability. This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the efficacy with which machine learning (ML) algorithms predict post-operative outcomes in meningioma patients.

methodsA literature search was conducted in December 2023 by two independent reviewers through PubMed, DARE, Cochrane Library and SCOPUS electronic databases. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted.

resultsSystematic searches yielded 32 studies, comprising 142,459 patients and 139,043 meningiomas. Random-effects meta-analysis sought to generate restricted maximum-likelihood estimates for the accuracy of alternate ML algorithms in predicting several postoperative outcomes. ML models incorporating both clinical and radiomic data significantly outperformed models utilizing either data type alone as well as traditional methods. Pooled estimates for the AUCs achieved by different ML algorithms ranged from 0.74-0.81 in the prediction of overall survival and progression-/recurrence-free survival, with ensemble classifiers demonstrating particular promise for future clinical application. Additionally, current ML models may exhibit a bias in predictive accuracy towards female patients, presumably due to the higher prevalence of meningiomas in females.

conclusionThis review underscores the potential of ML to improve the accuracy of prognoses for meningioma patients and provides insight into which model classes offer the greatest potential for predicting survival outcomes. However, future research will have to directly compare standardized ML methodologies to traditional approaches in large-scale, prospective studies, before their clinical utility can be confidently validated.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaHumansTreatment OutcomeMachine learningMeningiomaPostoperative outcomesPredictive accuracySurvival prognosis

Identifiers

PMID39688716
PMCPMC11652405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.