ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
A deep learning method for total-body dynamic PET imaging with dual-time-window protocols.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Kinetic modeling with total body PET-current status and future applications.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeProlonged scanning durations are one of the primary barriers to the widespread clinical adoption of dynamic Positron Emission Tomography (PET). In this paper, we developed a deep learning algorithm that capable of predicting dynamic images from dual-time-window protocols, thereby shortening the scanning time.
methodsThis study includes 70 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 53.61 ± 13.53 years; 32 males) diagnosed with pulmonary nodules or breast nodules between 2022 to 2024. Each patient underwent a 65-min dynamic total-body [
resultsThe Bi-AT-Seq2Seq significantly outperform unidirectional or non-attentional models in terms of MAE, Bias, PSNR, and SSIM. Using a dual-time-window protocol, which includes a 10-min early scan followed by a 5-min late scan, improves the four metrics of predicted dynamic images by 37.31%, 36.24%, 7.10%, and 0.014% respectively, compared to the early-stop protocol with a 15-min acquisition. The CCCs of tumor' kinetic parameters estimated with recovered full time-activity-curves (TACs) is higher than those with abbreviated TACs.
conclusionThe proposed algorithm can accurately generate a complete dynamic acquisition (65 min) from dual-time-window protocols (10 + 5 min).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39688700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.