Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688647›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024

Lichtenstein repair for giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a retrospective case-control study.

Jin Cuihong, Wang Fan, Shen Yingmo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jin CuihongDepartment of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital MedicalUniversity, Beijing, 100043, China.
Wang FanDepartment of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital MedicalUniversity, Beijing, 100043, China.
Shen YingmoDepartment of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital MedicalUniversity, Beijing, 100043, China. shenyingmo@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5621-1187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiant inguinoscrotal hernia (GISH) is a rare condition in high-income regions, and the management presents a significant challenge for surgeons. A retrospective analysis was conducted of a single center's experience in treating GISH by Lichtenstein approach. The objective was to gain insight into the characteristics of GISH and assess the clinical efficacy of the Lichtenstein approach, as well as the degree of improvement in patient quality of life (QoL).

methodsData from consecutive GISH patients who had undergone Lichtenstein repair at our institution from December 2018 to December 2023 were prospectively collected. The control group for the 1:2 matched case-control study was selected from pure inguinal hernia patients who underwent Lichtenstein repair during the same period. The demographics and surgical characteristics were analyzed. QoL and surgical satisfaction were respectively evaluated using the Carolina Comfort Scale and Numerical Rating Scale.

resultsA total of 51 patients with GISH who underwent Lichtenstein repair were identified, and 102 patients with a pure inguinal hernia who underwent Lichtenstein repair were included in the control group. Patients in the GISH group exhibited a higher BMI than those in the control group; they also had a significantly longer hernia duration and a higher incidence of irreducible bulge. Additionally, the GISH patients had significantly higher ASA scores. All the Lichtenstein procedures were uneventful. There were more additional surgical procedures in GISH group, including hernia sac resection in 50 patients (98%) and adhesion release in 23 patients (45.1%). Five patients with GISH underwent omentectomy and one patient underwent testicular resection due to severe adhesions. The GISH group exhibited a higher incidence of postoperative complications. Five patients experienced urinary retention, and one intestinal obstruction. Two patients underwent surgical drainage under local anesthesia at one month postoperatively and made a full recovery. At six months postoperatively, the mean CCS score for the patients was 0.5 ± 0.8, with 21 patients (20.6%) scoring ≥ 2 out of the 23 categories. The results of the surgical satisfaction survey indicated that 130 patients (85.0%) gave a score of 5, reflecting high levels of satisfaction after Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

conclusionPatients with GISH typically have a long medical history, a high proportion of irreducible masses, and severe comorbidities, making surgery challenging. However, Lichtenstein repair remains a feasible and safe with high patient satisfaction and improved postoperative quality of life.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyQuality of LifeAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesScrotumSurgical MeshCase–control studyGiant inguinoscrotal herniaLichtensteinQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.