Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688623›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Application of stepped care model in cancer patients: a scoping review.

Pan Yang, Liuyi Zhang, Xin Tian

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pan YangSchool of Nursing, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Liuyi ZhangSchool of Nursing, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China. Liuyizhang@hunnu.edu.cn.
Xin TianSchool of Nursing, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo clarify the implementation steps, characteristics, effects, acceptability, and feasibility of the stepped care model (SCM) while also offering a resource for pertinent interventions in cancer care.

methodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases from inception to October 22, 2023. Two key concepts were used: cancer and stepped care model. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and extracted data by repeatedly reading the abstracts and full texts. The included literature was analyzed according to the updated framework for scoping reviews proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI).

resultsA total of 14 studies were included. Most of the reviewed SCMs comprised two steps: self-management interventions in the first step and cognitive-behavior interventions in the second step. Most often, interventions were delivered electronically. The main applications of SCM included providing psychological support, treating insomnia and relieving cancer-related fatigue. SCM was effective in improving multiple outcomes for cancer patients with feasibility and acceptability.

conclusionsSCM has a promising future and is applicable to oncology care. Further research on facilitators and barriers to the application of this model in cancer care is needed to enhance patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansSelf-ManagementOncology careOutcomesQuality of lifeScoping reviewSelf-managementStepped care model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.