ArticleMolecular ecology2025
Ocean-Wide Conservation Genomics of Blue Whales Suggest New Northern Hemisphere Subspecies.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- What Do We Know About Hybrid Blue (Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- The genome of the relict earless monitor lizard, Lanthanotus borneensis, and the Toxicofera hypothesis.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Biodiversity Genomics Research Practices Require Harmonising to Meet Stakeholder Needs in Conservation.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Eden's Whale Clarifies the Taxonomy and Speciation of Bryde's Whale Complex.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Ocean-Wide Conservation Genomics of Blue Whales Suggest New Northern Hemisphere Subspecies.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The blue whale is an endangered and globally distributed species of baleen whale with multiple described subspecies, including the morphologically and genetically distinct pygmy blue whale. North Atlantic and North Pacific populations, however, are currently regarded as a single subspecies despite being separated by continental land masses and acoustic call differences. To determine the degree of isolation among the Northern Hemisphere populations, 14 North Pacific and 6 Western Australian blue whale nuclear and mitochondrial genomes were sequenced and analysed together with 11 publicly available North Atlantic blue whale genomes. Population genomic analyses revealed distinctly differentiated clusters and limited genetic exchange among all three populations, indicating a high degree of isolation between the Northern Hemisphere populations. Nevertheless, the genomic and mitogenomic distances between all blue whale populations, including the Western Australian pygmy blue whale, are low when compared to other inter-subspecies distances in cetaceans. Given that the Western Australian pygmy blue whale is an already recognised subspecies and further supported by previously reported acoustic differences, a proposal is made to treat the two Northern Hemisphere populations as separate subspecies, namely Balaenoptera musculus musculus (North Atlantic blue whale) and Balaenoptera musculus sulfureus (North Pacific blue whale). Furthermore, a first molecular viability assessment of all three populations not only found a generally high genomic diversity among blue whales but also a lack of alleles at low frequency, non-neutral evolution and increased effects of inbreeding. This suggests a substantial anthropogenic impact on the genotypes of blue whales and calls for careful monitoring in future conservation plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.