Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688513›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

An electronic health record metadata-mining approach to identifying patient-level interprofessional clinician teams in the intensive care unit.

Olga Yakusheva, Lara Khadr, Kathryn A Lee, Hannah C Ratliff, Deanna J Marriott, Deena Kelly Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond the individual.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olga YakushevaThe Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5501-1397
Lara KhadrUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Kathryn A LeeThe Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Hannah C RatliffDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States.
Deanna J MarriottDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Deena Kelly CostaYale School of Nursing, West Haven, CT 06516, United States.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
AHRQ HHS K01 HS029428AHRQ HHS R01 HS028438AHRQ HHS R01HS029428American Thoracic SocietyAmerican Thoracic Society Nursing ResearchNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863University of Michigan School of NursingUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing Donor Funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdvances in health informatics rapidly expanded use of big-data analytics and electronic health records (EHR) by clinical researchers seeking to optimize interprofessional ICU team care. This study developed and validated a program for extracting interprofessional teams assigned to each patient each shift from EHR event logs. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of EHR event logs for mechanically-ventilated patients 18 and older from 5 ICUs in an academic medical center during 1/1/2018-12/31/2019. We defined interprofessional teams as all medical providers (physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners), registered nurses, and respiratory therapists assigned to each patient each shift. We created an EHR event logs-mining program that extracts clinicians who interact with each patient's medical record each shift. The algorithm was validated using the Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6) method against manual chart review of a random sample of 200 patient-shifts from each ICU by two independent reviewers.

resultsOur sample included 4559 ICU encounters and 72 846 patient-shifts. Our program extracted 3288 medical providers, 2702 registered nurses, and 219 respiratory therapists linked to these encounters. Eighty-three percent of patient-shift teams included medical providers, 99.3% included registered nurses, and 74.1% included respiratory therapists; 63.4% of shift-level teams included clinicians from all three professions. The program demonstrated 95.9% precision, 96.2% recall, and high face validity. DISCUSSION: Our EHR event logs-mining program has high precision, recall, and validity for identifying patient-levelshift interprofessional teams in ICUs.

conclusionsAlgorithmic and artificial intelligence approaches have a strong potential for informing research to optimize patient team assignments and improve ICU care and outcomes.

Indexed as

Data MiningElectronic Health RecordsIntensive Care UnitsPatient Care TeamAlgorithmsHumansMaleRetrospective Studieselectronic health recordsintensive careinterprofessional teams

Identifiers

PMID39688513
PMCPMC11833494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.