ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
An electronic health record metadata-mining approach to identifying patient-level interprofessional clinician teams in the intensive care unit.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Algorithmic Identification of the Daily Primary Frontline Clinician during Inpatient Medicine Encounters Using EHR Audit Log Data.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
- Beyond the individual.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- A Digital Clinical Records Versus Paper Records in Dental Practice: A Comparative Study.BioMed research international · 2025Article
- Reimagining clinical AI: from clickstreams to clinical insights with EHR use metadata.npj health systems · 2025Review
- Shift-Level Team Familiarity Is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Adults.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAdvances in health informatics rapidly expanded use of big-data analytics and electronic health records (EHR) by clinical researchers seeking to optimize interprofessional ICU team care. This study developed and validated a program for extracting interprofessional teams assigned to each patient each shift from EHR event logs. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of EHR event logs for mechanically-ventilated patients 18 and older from 5 ICUs in an academic medical center during 1/1/2018-12/31/2019. We defined interprofessional teams as all medical providers (physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners), registered nurses, and respiratory therapists assigned to each patient each shift. We created an EHR event logs-mining program that extracts clinicians who interact with each patient's medical record each shift. The algorithm was validated using the Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6) method against manual chart review of a random sample of 200 patient-shifts from each ICU by two independent reviewers.
resultsOur sample included 4559 ICU encounters and 72 846 patient-shifts. Our program extracted 3288 medical providers, 2702 registered nurses, and 219 respiratory therapists linked to these encounters. Eighty-three percent of patient-shift teams included medical providers, 99.3% included registered nurses, and 74.1% included respiratory therapists; 63.4% of shift-level teams included clinicians from all three professions. The program demonstrated 95.9% precision, 96.2% recall, and high face validity. DISCUSSION: Our EHR event logs-mining program has high precision, recall, and validity for identifying patient-levelshift interprofessional teams in ICUs.
conclusionsAlgorithmic and artificial intelligence approaches have a strong potential for informing research to optimize patient team assignments and improve ICU care and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.