Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688471›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Commissioning of the Varian universal interstitial cylinder system for HDR brachytherapy of gynecological cancer.

Sheridan Meltsner, Oana Craciunescu, Julie Raffi, Casey Lee, Yang Sheng, Junzo Chino, Diandra Ayala-Peacock, Yongbok Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sheridan MeltsnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Oana CraciunescuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Julie RaffiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Casey LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Yang ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Junzo ChinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Diandra Ayala-PeacockDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Yongbok KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4631-4334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis paper outlines the commissioning of the Varian (VMS, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) Universal Interstitial Cylinder (UIC) applicator set for Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy. The UIC was commissioned for use with CT and MRI and a custom phantom was designed to avoid the introduction of water-like materials into the needle guide tracks. Various marker strands were investigated to determine which allowed the most accurate reconstruction of source positions.

methodsPlanar kV and MV imaging, along with physical measurements and autoradiographs, were used to commission the physical dimensions of all components of the UIC applicator set. CT and MR imaging was used to further commission one configuration of the UIC with UCP and eight interstitial needles in a simulated clinical setup using a GYN phantom. Three different methods of channel identification were compared - no radio opaque markers, VMS numbered markers, or nylon coated stainless steel leader wires - to see which best aided in channel identification and image registration. An HDR MRI Lumen marker (C4 Imaging, LLC) was used to verify any applicator rotation on MR scans during image registration. Three types of GYN phantoms were investigated - wet towel, gelatin, and ground beef. Dimensions of all components were compared with vendor provided information, including the solid applicator models, which are based on the computer-aided design model files of the specific applicators.

resultsThe dimensions of the applicators could be validated using physical measurements, kV and MV planar imaging, and CT scans. The ground beef based GYN phantom best eliminated the introduction of water into the needle guide tracks that was found when using a water or gel-based phantom. CT scans using no radio opaque markers did not allow the plastic needles to be visualized well enough to digitize source positions. CT scans with VMS markers showed significant artifact. CT scans with the nylon coated stainless steel wires provided the best visibility of the needle locations to aid in digitizing source positions. The use of an MR marker allowed the channel to be identified on the MR scan and confirm rotation for image registration.

conclusionsThe UIC set and applicator configuration was commissioned for CT and MR based treatment planning. The plastic components of the UIC applicator set pose challenges to the commissioning process but the use of radio opaque markers seen on CT combined with MR image registration allow the source positions within the needles, as well as the location of the end of the needles, to be digitized appropriately. A ground beef phantom minimized the fluid introduced into the needle guide track, minimizing any unintended MR and CT signal in the needle guide tracks.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyGenital Neoplasms, FemaleIridium RadioisotopesPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedIridium-192Iridium Radioisotopesapplicator commissioningGYN HDR brachytherapyuniversal interstitial cylinder

Identifiers

PMID39688471
PMCPMC11799899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.