ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Two-transcript signature for differentiation and clinical outcomes in severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) patients: a double-blind, multicenter, validation study.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Novel Predictive Model and Simplified Clinical Indicator for Mortality in Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Patients.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Transient expansion of peripheral Lambda-expressing plasma cells represents a distinctive phenotype associated with SFTSV infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Pathogen spectrum, clinical traits and exploration of mortality outcome-improving medication regimens in coinfection patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging infectious disease with a high mortality rate that is often underdiagnosed due to the limitations of current laboratory testing. Timely diagnosis and early identification of severe cases are crucial to improving patient outcomes and overall survival rates. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of two transcripts, IFI44L and PI3, in the early differentiation between SFTS virus (SFTSV) infection and bacterial sepsis, as well as in the prompt identification of severe cases during epidemic seasons. In a prospective study conducted between 1 May 2021 and 30 September 2022, we enrolled 225 patients who presented with acute fever and thrombocytopenia at four hospitals in Shandong Province, China. The two-transcript signature provided a clear distinction between SFTS and bacterial infection, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.961 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.916-0.986), outperforming C-reactive protein (0.810 [95% CI 0.738-0.870]) and procalcitonin (0.764 [95% CI 0.687-0.830]). Importantly, the relative expression of the IFI44L gene was significantly elevated in fatal SFTS cases, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.820 (95% CI 0.727-0.914), indicating its potential as an early prognostic marker. Additionally, IFI44L and PI3 were identified as potential biomarkers for distinguishing SFTS patients with and without invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, with AUC values of 0.817 and 0.753, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that the two-transcript signature effectively distinguishes SFTSV infection from bacterial sepsis and helps identify high-risk individuals, guiding appropriate treatment during SFTS outbreak.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.