Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688399›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Design and 3D printing of pelvis phantoms for cementoplasty.

Cléa Sieffert, Laurence Meylheuc, Bernard Bayle, Julien Garnon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cléa SieffertICube Laboratory, University of Strasbourg UMR 7357 CNRS, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1547-300X
Laurence MeylheucICube Laboratory, University of Strasbourg UMR 7357 CNRS, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-8127
Bernard BayleICube Laboratory, University of Strasbourg UMR 7357 CNRS, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4728-8593
Julien GarnonICube Laboratory, University of Strasbourg UMR 7357 CNRS, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1445-7346

Funding

French National Research Association (ANR)Idex Unistra (French) ANR-10-IDEX-0002ITI HealthTech 2021-2028Labex CAMI (French) ANR-11-LABX-000STRAT'US project ANR-20-SFRI-0012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous image-guided cementoplasty is a medical procedure for strengthening bones structurally altered by disease, such as osteolytic metastasis. This procedure involves injecting biocompatible liquid bone cement, through one or more trocars into the damaged bone. Within a few minutes the bone cement hardens and restores the rigidity of the bony structure. The introduction of this technique in the case of large cancellous bones, such as the pelvis, raises some practical issues such as: how to manage the flow of cement with variable viscosity over time and how to inject a large amount of cement under fluoroscopy to effectively restore the patient's ability to bear weight? PURPOSE: As a means of training for young practitioners to ensure maximal filling of a metastatic bone area, we have designed and manufactured a pelvic phantom capable of replicating cement diffusion in healthy and metastatic bone under fluoroscopic and computed tomography guidance.

methodsThe preliminary stage of the study consisted of an analysis of various lattice structures, with the objective of reproducing the haptic feedback experienced during the needle insertion and diffusion of cement within the trabecular bone. Cementoplasty tests were conducted by an experienced radiologist under fluoroscopy and CT guidance to evaluate the performance of the lattice structure. The initial analysis provided the groundwork for the design of the phantom pelvis, which was then evaluated against a patient case. The phantom was divided into two distinct components: a disposable section with lattice structure, intended for the injection of cement, and a reusable part representing the pelvic bones. Two additive manufacturing methods were selected for the production of the phantom: Stereolithography (SLA) for the lattice structure and Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) for the pelvic bones. The disposable component was composed of different lattice structures, selected to best match the anatomic conditions of both healthy and diseased areas visible on the patient images. Subsequently, the performance of the phantom was validated against patient images through a cementoplasty test.

resultsA total of 12 distinct lattice structures were subjected to three tests of cementoplasty. Stochastic lattices with 500 microns beam thickness and densities varying from 15% to 5% demonstrated the most effective replication of the needle haptic feedback, as well as the diffusion of the cement into healthy and osteolytic cancellous bone. These structures were then implanted in the phantom and validated against one patient case.

conclusionsA methodology to design and manufacture a phantom dedicated to cementoplasty from patient images is proposed. Initially, a series of lattice structures, exhibiting diverse structure types, thicknesses, and densities, were evaluated to assess their capacity to accurately reproduce the haptic feedback of the needle and the diffusion of cement in the trabecular bone. Subsequent to the outcomes of these investigations, several structures were selected for the development of a phantom capable of accurately replicating a cementoplasty procedure under fluoroscopy and CT guidance. This phantom will enable the training of future practitioners on the procedure of cementoplasty in the pelvis.

Indexed as

CementoplastyPelvisPhantoms, ImagingPrinting, Three-DimensionalBone CementsEquipment DesignFluoroscopyHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone Cementscementoplastyinterventional radiologyphantoms

Identifiers

PMID39688399
PMCPMC11880649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.