Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39688388›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2025

Imipenem Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics in Preclinical Hollow Fiber Model, Dose Finding in Virtual Patients, and Clinical Evidence of Efficacy for Mycobacterium abscessus Lung Disease.

Sanjay Singh, Tawanda Gumbo, Jann-Yuan Wang, Gunavanthi D Boorgula, Andrew Burke, Hung-Ling Huang, Pamela J McShane, Rodolfo Amaro-Galvez, Jane E Gross, Santosh Aryal and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Role of β-Lactam Antibiotics in Treating Mycobacterium abscessus: From Laboratory Insights to Clinical Applications and the Case for Clinical Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sanjay SinghDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4601-5673
Tawanda GumboMathematical Modeling and AI Department, Praedicare, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7592-8012
Jann-Yuan WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3406-366X
Gunavanthi D BoorgulaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.
Andrew BurkeFaculty of Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital Rode Rd Chermside, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2742-1556
Hung-Ling HuangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsuing, Taiwan.
Pamela J McShaneDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.
Rodolfo Amaro-GalvezDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.
Jane E GrossDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, National Jewish Hospital, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Santosh AryalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Health Outcomes, The Ben and Maytee Fisch College of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.
Scott K HeysellDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Shashikant SrivastavaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8786-8851

Funding

Short course combination regimens for treatment of Mycobacterium avium pulmonary disease: a translational bench-to-bedside approachR01AI179827 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH CTR AT TYLER · PI Shashi Kant · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
PK/PD Optimized Cephalosporins Based Treatment Regimens for Children With MDR-TBR01HD099756 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH CTR AT TYLER · PI KANT, SHASHI · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
Reinforcing old warriors to treat Mycobacterium kansasii in shorter durationR21AI148096 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH CTR AT TYLER · PI KANT, SHASHI · 2020 to 2021
$413k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI179827NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI148096NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuideline-based therapy (GBT) for Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) lung disease achieves sputum culture conversion (SCC) rates of 35%. This poor GBT efficacy is mirrored in the hollow fiber system model of Mab (HFS-Mab). While imipenem is part of GBT, its biologic effect, with or without β-lactamase inhibitors, is unproven.

methodsWe performed imipenem-relebactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in 122 Mab isolates, and an exposure-response study in the HFS-Mab using human intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics. The percentage of time that concentration persisted above the MIC (TMIC), mediating maximal effect in the HFS-Mab, was used as the exposure target for dose finding in a Monte Carlo experiment including 10 000 virtual patients. For real-world evidence, we performed a patient, intervention (imipenem), comparison (no β-lactam), and outcome (SCC) (PICO) analysis.

resultsImipenem killed 1.32 log10 colony-forming units/mL below the day 0 level in HFS-Mab. The average target exposure for imipenem was a TMIC of 47.9% (SD, 9.77%). Infusion of 1 g every 6 hours achieved the target in >90% of virtual patients in Monte Carlo experiments. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic MIC break point was 1 mg/L. In PICO analyses, the median time to SCC was 470 days in comparators, 311 days for imipenem added on to a failing regimen, and 37 days in newly treated patients (P = .049). The odds ratio for SCC when imipenem was part of the initial regimen, versus comparators, was 12.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.47--84.55). No patients receiving imipenem experienced treatment-limiting adverse events, compared with 2 of 7 comparators (P = .046). Middlebrook 7H9 broth MIC distribution, read at 24 hours, was better correlated with patient responses than cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth.

conclusionsImipenem demonstrated biologic effect in the HFS-Mab and in patients. Imipenem-relebactam doses of 1 g every 6 hours are recommended.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsImipenemLung DiseasesMycobacterium abscessusMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousAzabicyclo CompoundsFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodSputumTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsImipenemrelebactamHollow fiber systemimipenemMonte Carlo experimentsmycobacterium abscessusrelebactam

Identifiers

PMID39688388
PMCPMC12475910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.