ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2024
Interplay Between the In-Vitro Cleaning Performance and Wear of Manual Toothbrushes in Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.
Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Bristle Hardness of Manual Toothbrushes on the Cleaning Efficacy of Teeth with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- Subgingival Plaque Removal Efficacy and Oral Soft Tissue Safety of the Wave Electric Toothbrush: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the impact of manual toothbrush usage duration and associated wear on cleaning performance in a tooth model with fixed orthodontic appliances. MATERIALS AND
methodsBlack resin teeth with attached brackets were coated with a white layer of titanium dioxide and subjected to brushing using a brushing machine. Two distinct brushing motions, horizontal and circular, were tested. Following each brushing session, the percentage of cleaned areas (total and adjacent to the bracket) was measured to determine the cleaning performance of the toothbrushes. Usage was simulated using a 3D-printed tooth relief with brackets and wire. Cleaning performance was re-evaluated after simulated 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of usage, and toothbrush wear was quantified respectively.
resultsCleaning performance of all investigated brushing motions and tooth areas improved during the test period, although statistical significance was only reached for horizontal brushing. Furthermore, horizontal brushing proved more effective regarding total tooth area and the area adjacent to the bracket compared to circular brushing.
conclusionThis in-vitro data shows that toothbrushes may feature sufficient or even improved cleaning performance on teeth with orthodontic appliances even after 24 months. However, direct transferability into the clinical setting is limited, as in-vivo toothbrush wear is complex and depends on individual patient habits, and other factors might necessitate an earlier toothbrush change. Nevertheless, this study suggests that cleaning performance and thus oral hygiene in patients with orthodontic appliances may not be critically dependent on usage duration and visual appearance of the toothbrush itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.