ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Colonoscopy Screening Behavior in First-Degree Relatives of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An empirical study on the influencing factors and mechanisms of contract compliance intention among oriented medical students in China: the case of Hubei Province.Human resources for health · 2026Article
- Knowledge-attitude-practice of pneumoconiosis prevention and control among Chinese university students: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the factors influencing the colonoscopy screening behavior of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients and to provide a basis for formulating screening intervention strategies. In this study, 15 first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in the Department of Medical Oncology of a tertiary hospital in Baoding City from May to July 2024 were selected as the research subjects, and face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted. The theme was analyzed and summarized based on the theory of planned behavior and Colaizzi's 7-step analysis method. Results of this study identified 12 themes from 3 aspects. For behavioral attitudes, 4 themes emerged: (1) Negative screening emotions caused by psychological stress, (2) Lack of awareness of the importance of screening due to cognitive biases, (3) Screening behavior caused by fatalistic views is systematically underestimated, and (4) Affirm the value of early screening. For subjective norms (The impact of external information on screening behavior), 4 themes emerged: (1) Family support, (2) Advice from a healthcare professional, (3) information support from online media, (4) Personal experience and suggestions from friends. For perceived behavior control, 4 themes emerged: (1) Unbearable pain and embarrassment, (2) Busyness of life and work, (3) Medical treatment process and transportation convenience, and (4) Screening costs. The colonoscopy screening behavior of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients is affected by behavioral attitudes, subjective norms (The impact of external information on screening behavior), and perceived behavior control. Clinical medical staff should correct their behavioral cognitive biases from the perspective of first-degree relatives, use positive belief factors to avoid wrong cognition, pay attention to a variety of sources of support, stimulate the self-efficacy of first-degree relatives, and create a suitable environment for colonoscopy screening, to promote the change of colonoscopy screening behavior of first-degree relatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.