Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687999›Full record

ReviewInternational nursing review2025

Defining nurse-led models of care: Contemporary approaches to nursing.

Jarrod Clarke, Kate Davis, Jane Douglas, Micah D J Peters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International nursing review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jarrod ClarkeUniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4824-6195
Kate DavisUniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4473-436X
Jane DouglasAustralian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (Federal Office), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-1519
Micah D J PetersUniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-3783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evolving nature of nursing practice necessitates the development and implementation of contemporary models of care; however, inconsistent definitions hinder this. With the increasing demand for nurse-led models of care, it is crucial to establish a consistent understanding to ensure the efficacy of implemented models.

aimWe aim to provide a working definition for nursing models of care, then using this, present the key features that nurse-led models of care should consider. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: An unstructured literature review was used to explore the research aim. DISCUSSION: We propose that nursing models of care be defined as involving three interrelated domains: (1) a theoretical basis that underpins conceptualisation of care, (2) organisational work methods that direct task delegation, organisational governance, and care responsibility and (3) practical methods for care delivery that describes practical care methodologies. Extrapolating from this framework, nurse-led models of care are defined as having an evidence-based and person-centred theoretical basis, an organisational work method driven by nurses, and practical methods of care delivery supported by the creation of holistic care plans.

conclusionAs the design and implementation of a model of care is influenced by unique contextual considerations, the definitions provided in this paper should be considered as a starting point for further refinement, consideration and discussion. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING POLICY: Standardisation in how models of care are defined enables greater understanding and improved comparability between disparate sources of evidence and can aid stakeholders by providing a common language. Creating standardisation in the terminology of nurse-led models of care specifically supports the continued advocacy efforts for these models of care and assists policymakers and health providers in their design and implementation.

Indexed as

Models, NursingHumansNurse's RoleNursing CarePractice Patterns, Nurses'Health care deliveryhealth policymodel of carenurse‐led carenursingnursing roles

Identifiers

PMID39687999
PMCPMC11865630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.