ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Understanding the PULSAR effect in combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy using transformer-based attention mechanisms.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of NALIRIFOX Combined With Adebrelimab and PULSAR as First-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
A Phase II Clinical Trial of Anlotinib Combined With Cadonilimab and PULSAR in Previously Treated Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized Ultrafractionated Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer and Lung Metastases: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 5 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Reframing the paradigm: stereotactic body radiation therapy as an engineer of the tumor immune microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Mathematical modeling of the synergetic effect between radiotherapy and immunotherapy.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PULSAR (personalized, ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy) is the adaptation of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy towards personalized cancer management. It has potential to harness the synergy between radiation therapy and immunotherapy, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors to amplify the anti-tumor immune response. For the first time, we applied a transformer-based attention mechanism to investigate the underlying interactions between combined PULSAR and PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy, based on the preliminary experimental results of a murine cancer model (Lewis Lung Carcinoma, LLC). The radiation and administration of α-PD-L1 were viewed as two external stimulation signals occurring in a temporal sequence. Our study demonstrates the utility of a transformer model in 1) predicting tumor changes in response to specific treatment schemes, and 2) generating self-attention and cross-attention maps. The cross-attention maps serve as a biological representation of the semantic similarity between source and target sentences in neural translation, offering insights into the causal relationships of the PULSAR effect. Our model offers a unique perspective with the potential to enhance the understanding of the temporal dependencies of the PULSAR effect on time, dose, and T cell dynamics. In a broader context, our proposed framework offers the potential to explore varying intervals and doses for subsequent treatments while monitoring the biological parameters impacted by these perturbations. This approach can lead to more personalized and rational radiation or drug interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.