ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Computer-aided endoscopic diagnostic system modified with hyperspectral imaging for the classification of esophageal neoplasms.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Evaluation of the Usefulness of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence on Hyperspectral Images in the Diagnosis of Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- ENDOSWIR clinical proof of concept: a reflectance-based multispectral imaging device for head and neck cancer detection.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy and high-quality data for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in the detection and characterization of gastrointestinal premalignant and early malignant lesions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Precision Care in Screening, Surveillance, and Overall Management of Barrett's Esophagus.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Unique Function in Cancer Stemness and Prognostic Significance ofBiomedicines · 2025Article
- Optimization strategies for ultrasound zoning of cervical lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: a precision medicine approach.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluation of Ki-67 expression levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using dual-energy CT quantitative parameters.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Self-supervised learning framework for efficient classification of endoscopic images using pretext tasks.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The early detection of esophageal cancer is crucial to enhancing patient survival rates, and endoscopy remains the gold standard for identifying esophageal neoplasms. Despite this fact, accurately diagnosing superficial esophageal neoplasms poses a challenge, even for seasoned endoscopists. Recent advancements in computer-aided diagnostic systems, empowered by artificial intelligence (AI), have shown promising results in elevating the diagnostic precision for early-stage esophageal cancer. Methods: In this study, we expanded upon traditional red-green-blue (RGB) imaging by integrating the YOLO neural network algorithm with hyperspectral imaging (HSI) to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of this innovative AI system for superficial esophageal neoplasms. A total of 1836 endoscopic images were utilized for model training, which included 858 white-light imaging (WLI) and 978 narrow-band imaging (NBI) samples. These images were categorized into three groups, namely, normal esophagus, esophageal squamous dysplasia, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Results: An additional set comprising 257 WLI and 267 NBI images served as the validation dataset to assess diagnostic accuracy. Within the RGB dataset, the diagnostic accuracies of the WLI and NBI systems for classifying images into normal, dysplasia, and SCC categories were 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. Conversely, the HSI dataset yielded higher diagnostic accuracies for the WLI and NBI systems, with scores of 0.90 and 0.89, respectively. Conclusion: The HSI dataset outperformed the RGB dataset, demonstrating an overall diagnostic accuracy improvement of 8%. Our findings underscored the advantageous impact of incorporating the HSI dataset in model training. Furthermore, the application of HSI in AI-driven image recognition algorithms significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy for early esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.