Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687887›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Mendelian randomization study of the relationship between blood and urine biomarkers and lung cancer.

Haihua Huang, Haijun Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haihua HuangThe First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, China.
Haijun ZhengThe First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying suitable biomarkers is crucial for exploring the pathogenesis, early screening, and therapeutic monitoring of lung cancer. This study aims to analyze comprehensively the associations between lung cancer and biomarkers in blood and urine. Methods: Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to evaluate the potential causal relationships between blood and urine biomarkers and lung cancer. We obtained Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to lung cancer from the 2021 Finnish database of genome-wide association studies, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC), total non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lung adenocarcinoma (LAC), and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).Data on blood and urine biomarkers were derived from the UK Biobank cohort, comprising 376,807 participants. Results: We found a potential inverse causal relationship between total bilirubin and SCLC (β=-0.285, P=0.015, FDR=0.12). Urate was inversely associated with NSCLC (β=-0.158, P=0.004, FDR=0.036*). Serum calcium showed a possible inverse relationship with lung squamous cell carcinoma (β=-0.256, P=0.046, FDR=0.138), while urinary creatinine was positively associated (β=1.233, P=0.024, FDR=0.216). Non-albumin proteins (β=-0.272, P=0.020, FDR=0.180) and total protein (β=-0.402, P=0.009, FDR=0.072) were inversely related to lung squamous cell carcinoma. The AST/ALT ratio was positively associated with lung adenocarcinoma (β=0.293, P=0.009, FDR=0.072). Our reverse Mendelian randomization study found a positive causal association between small cell lung cancer and serum creatinine (β=0.022, P=0.002, FDR=0.018*), while it was inversely associated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)(β=-0.022, P=0.003, FDR=0.027*). A positive causal relationship was also observed with cystatin C (β=0.026, P=0.005, FDR=0.045*) and glycated hemoglobin HbA1c (β=0.013, P=0.014, FDR=0.028*). A negative causal relationship was observed with Gamma_glutamyltransferase (β=-0.013, P=0.019, FDR=0.152). For non-small cell lung cancer, a negative causal relationship was found with albumin (β=-0.024, P=0.002, FDR=0.016*), while a potentially positive causal relationship was observed with cystatin C (β=0.022, P=0.006, FDR=0.054). Possible negative causal relationships were also observed with phosphate (β=-0.013, P=0.008, FDR=0.072) and urinary potassium (β=-0.011, P=0.012, FDR=0.108), while a potential positive causal relationship was observed with C-reactive protein (β=0.013, P=0.040, FDR=0.280).Regarding lung squamous cell carcinoma, an inverse causal relationship was found with eGFR (β=-0.022, P=9.58e-06, FDR=8.62×10-5*), while a positive causal relationship was observed with serum creatinine (β=0.021, P=1.16e-4, FDR=1.05×10-3*). Potential positive causal relationships were observed with Urate (β=0.012, P=0.020, FDR=0.180), urea (β=0.010, P=0.046, FDR=0.141), and glycated hemoglobin HbA1c (β=0.020, P=0.049, FDR P=0.098), whereas a potential negative causal relationship was observed with sex hormone-binding globulin(SHBG) (β=-0.020, P=0.036, FDR=0.108).Lastly, adenocarcinoma was found to have a positive causal association with alkaline phosphatase (β=0.015, P=0.006, FDR=0.033*). Conclusion: Our study provides a robust theoretical basis for the early screening and therapeutic monitoring of lung cancer and contributes to understanding the pathogenesis of the disease.

Indexed as

biochemical markers in blood and urinelung cancerMendelian randomizationscPagwas methodscRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID39687887
PMCPMC11646849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.