ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024
Informed-Learning-Guided Visual Question Answering Model of Crop Disease.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Visual Question Answering Dataset for Benchmarking Vision-Language Models in Plant Science.Scientific data · 2026Article
- ChatLeafDisease: a chain-of-thought prompting approach for crop disease classification using large language models.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In contemporary agriculture, experts develop preventative and remedial strategies for various disease stages in diverse crops. Decision-making regarding the stages of disease occurrence exceeds the capabilities of single-image tasks, such as image classification and object detection. Consequently, research now focuses on training visual question answering (VQA) models. However, existing studies concentrate on identifying disease species rather than formulating questions that encompass crucial multiattributes. Additionally, model performance is susceptible to the model structure and dataset biases. To address these challenges, we construct the informed-learning-guided VQA model of crop disease (ILCD). ILCD improves model performance by integrating coattention, a multimodal fusion model (MUTAN), and a bias-balancing (BiBa) strategy. To facilitate the investigation of various visual attributes of crop diseases and the determination of disease occurrence stages, we construct a new VQA dataset called the Crop Disease Multi-attribute VQA with Prior Knowledge (CDwPK-VQA). This dataset contains comprehensive information on various visual attributes such as shape, size, status, and color. We expand the dataset by integrating prior knowledge into CDwPK-VQA to address performance challenges. Comparative experiments are conducted by ILCD on the VQA-v2, VQA-CP v2, and CDwPK-VQA datasets, achieving accuracies of 68.90%, 49.75%, and 86.06%, respectively. Ablation experiments are conducted on CDwPK-VQA to evaluate the effectiveness of various modules, including coattention, MUTAN, and BiBa. These experiments demonstrate that ILCD exhibits the highest level of accuracy, performance, and value in the field of agriculture. The source codes can be accessed at https://github.com/SdustZYP/ILCD-master/tree/main.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.