Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687877›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024

Informed-Learning-Guided Visual Question Answering Model of Crop Disease.

Yunpeng Zhao, Shansong Wang, Qingtian Zeng, Weijian Ni, Hua Duan, Nengfu Xie, Fengjin Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yunpeng ZhaoCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8432-4980
Shansong WangCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4208-2035
Qingtian ZengCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6421-8223
Weijian NiCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2676-571X
Hua DuanCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0947-2704
Nengfu XieAgricultural Information Institute of CAAS, Beijing 100081, China.
Fengjin XiaoNational Climate Center, Beijing 100081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contemporary agriculture, experts develop preventative and remedial strategies for various disease stages in diverse crops. Decision-making regarding the stages of disease occurrence exceeds the capabilities of single-image tasks, such as image classification and object detection. Consequently, research now focuses on training visual question answering (VQA) models. However, existing studies concentrate on identifying disease species rather than formulating questions that encompass crucial multiattributes. Additionally, model performance is susceptible to the model structure and dataset biases. To address these challenges, we construct the informed-learning-guided VQA model of crop disease (ILCD). ILCD improves model performance by integrating coattention, a multimodal fusion model (MUTAN), and a bias-balancing (BiBa) strategy. To facilitate the investigation of various visual attributes of crop diseases and the determination of disease occurrence stages, we construct a new VQA dataset called the Crop Disease Multi-attribute VQA with Prior Knowledge (CDwPK-VQA). This dataset contains comprehensive information on various visual attributes such as shape, size, status, and color. We expand the dataset by integrating prior knowledge into CDwPK-VQA to address performance challenges. Comparative experiments are conducted by ILCD on the VQA-v2, VQA-CP v2, and CDwPK-VQA datasets, achieving accuracies of 68.90%, 49.75%, and 86.06%, respectively. Ablation experiments are conducted on CDwPK-VQA to evaluate the effectiveness of various modules, including coattention, MUTAN, and BiBa. These experiments demonstrate that ILCD exhibits the highest level of accuracy, performance, and value in the field of agriculture. The source codes can be accessed at https://github.com/SdustZYP/ILCD-master/tree/main.

Identifiers

PMID39687877
PMCPMC11649200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.