ArticleHeliyon2024
Optimizing the topology of convolutional neural network (CNN) and artificial neural network (ANN) for brain tumor diagnosis (BTD) through MRIs.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rehabilitative game-based system for enhancing physical and cognitive abilities of neurological disorders.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence with feature fusion empowered enhanced brain stroke detection and classification for disabled persons using biomedical images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Brain tumor detection empowered with ensemble deep learning approaches from MRI scan images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of MRI analysis for BTD and tumor type detection has considerable importance within the domain of machine vision. Numerous methodologies have been proposed to address this issue, and significant progress has been achieved in this domain via the use of deep learning (DL) approaches. While the majority of offered approaches using artificial neural networks (ANNs) and deep neural networks (DNNs) demonstrate satisfactory performance in Bayesian Tree Descent (BTD), none of these research studies can ensure the optimality of the employed learning model structure. Put simply, there is room for improvement in the efficiency of these learning models in BTD. This research introduces a novel approach for optimizing the configuration of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to address the BTD issue. The suggested approach employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for the purpose of segmenting brain MRIs. The model's configurable hyper-parameters are tuned using a genetic algorithm (GA). The Multi-Linear Principal Component Analysis (MPCA) is used to decrease the dimensionality of the segmented features in the pictures after they have been segmented. Ultimately, the segmentation procedure is executed using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). In this artificial neural network (ANN), the genetic algorithm (GA) sets the ideal number of neurons in the hidden layer and the appropriate weight vector. The effectiveness of the suggested approach was assessed by utilizing the BRATS2014 and BTD20 databases. The results indicate that the proposed method can classify samples from these two databases with an average accuracy of 98.6 % and 99.1 %, respectively, which represents an accuracy improvement of at least 1.1 % over the preceding methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.