Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687857›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Optimizing the topology of convolutional neural network (CNN) and artificial neural network (ANN) for brain tumor diagnosis (BTD) through MRIs.

Jianhong Ye, Zhiyong Zhao, Ehsan Ghafourian, AmirReza Tajally, Hamzah Ali Alkhazaleh, Sangkeum Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianhong YeHead and Neck Surgery, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, 314500, Zhejiang, China.
Zhiyong ZhaoSchool of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3TF, UK.
Ehsan GhafourianDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
AmirReza TajallySchool of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Hamzah Ali AlkhazalehCollege of Engineering and IT, University of Dubai, Academic City, 14143, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Sangkeum LeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, 34158, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of MRI analysis for BTD and tumor type detection has considerable importance within the domain of machine vision. Numerous methodologies have been proposed to address this issue, and significant progress has been achieved in this domain via the use of deep learning (DL) approaches. While the majority of offered approaches using artificial neural networks (ANNs) and deep neural networks (DNNs) demonstrate satisfactory performance in Bayesian Tree Descent (BTD), none of these research studies can ensure the optimality of the employed learning model structure. Put simply, there is room for improvement in the efficiency of these learning models in BTD. This research introduces a novel approach for optimizing the configuration of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to address the BTD issue. The suggested approach employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for the purpose of segmenting brain MRIs. The model's configurable hyper-parameters are tuned using a genetic algorithm (GA). The Multi-Linear Principal Component Analysis (MPCA) is used to decrease the dimensionality of the segmented features in the pictures after they have been segmented. Ultimately, the segmentation procedure is executed using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). In this artificial neural network (ANN), the genetic algorithm (GA) sets the ideal number of neurons in the hidden layer and the appropriate weight vector. The effectiveness of the suggested approach was assessed by utilizing the BRATS2014 and BTD20 databases. The results indicate that the proposed method can classify samples from these two databases with an average accuracy of 98.6 % and 99.1 %, respectively, which represents an accuracy improvement of at least 1.1 % over the preceding methods.

Indexed as

Artificial neural network (ANN)Brain tumor diagnosis (BTD)Convolutional neural network (CNN)Genetic algorithm (GA)Multi-linear principal component analysis (MPCA)

Identifiers

PMID39687857
PMCPMC11647943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.