ArticleMaterials today. Bio2024
A three-phase strategy of bionic drug reservoir scaffold by 3D printing and layer-by-layer modification for chronic relapse management in traumatic osteomyelitis.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging biomaterials for osteomyelitis treatment: from material design to anti-infection and tissue regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Bridging biology and technology: the rise of 3D bioprinting advancements in infection research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have developed a novel three-phase strategy for osteomyelitis treatment, structured into three distinct phases: the "strong antimicrobial" phase, the "monitoring and osteogenesis" phase and the "bone repair" phase. To implement this staged therapeutic strategy, we engineered a bionic drug reservoir scaffold carrying a dual-drug combination of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and simvastatin (SV). The scaffold integrated a bilayer gel drug-carrying structure, based on an induced membrane and combined with a 3D-printed rigid bone graft using a layer-by-layer modification strategy. The mechanical strength of the composite scaffold (73.40 ± 22.44 MPa) is comparable to that of cancellous bone. This scaffold enables controlled, sequential drug release through a spatial structure design and nanoparticle drug-carrying strategy. AMPs are released rapidly, with the release efficiency of 74.90 ± 8.19 % at 14 days (pH = 7.2), thus enabling rapid antimicrobial therapy. Meanwhile, SV is released over a prolonged period, with a release efficiency of 98.98 ± 0.05 % over 40 days in vitro simulations, promoting sustained osteogenesis and facilitating the treatment of intracellular infections by activating macrophage extracellular traps (METs). The antimicrobial, osteogenic and immunomodulatory effects of the scaffolds were verified through in vitro and in vivo experiments. It was demonstrated that composite scaffolds were able to combat the chronic recurrence of osteomyelitis after debridement, by providing rapid sterilization, stimulating METs formation, and supporting osteogenic repair.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.