Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687732›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2024

mRNA vaccines encoding membrane-anchored RBDs of SARS-CoV-2 mutants induce strong humoral responses and can overcome immune imprinting.

Hareth A Al-Wassiti, Stewart A Fabb, Samantha L Grimley, Ruby Kochappan, Joan K Ho, Chinn Yi Wong, Chee Wah Tan, Thomas J Payne, Asuka Takanashi, Chee Leng Lee and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Hareth A Al-WassitiMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Stewart A FabbMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Samantha L GrimleyPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Ruby KochappanMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Joan K HoMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Chinn Yi WongPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Chee Wah TanDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Thomas J PayneMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Asuka TakanashiMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Chee Leng LeeMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Rekha Shandre MuganMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Horatio SiciliaMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Serena L Y TeoMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Julie McAuleyPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Paula EllenbergPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
James P CooneyWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Kathryn C DavidsonWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Richard BowenBiomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Marc PellegriniWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Steven RockmanPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Dale I GodfreyPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Terry M NolanPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Lin-Fa WangDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Georgia DeliyannisPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Damian F J PurcellPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Colin W PoutonMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated mRNA vaccines encoding a membrane-anchored receptor-binding domain (RBD), each a fusion of a variant RBD, the transmembrane (TM) and cytoplasmic tail fragments of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein. In naive mice, RBD-TM mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants induced strong humoral responses against the target RBD. Multiplex surrogate viral neutralization (sVNT) assays revealed broad neutralizing activity against a range of variant RBDs. In the setting of a heterologous boost, against the background of exposure to ancestral whole-spike vaccines, sVNT studies suggested that BA.1 and BA.5 RBD-TM vaccines had the potential to overcome the detrimental effects of immune imprinting. A subsequent heterologous boost study using XBB.1.5 booster vaccines was evaluated using both sVNT and authentic virus neutralization. Geometric mean XBB.1.5 neutralization values after third-dose RBD-TM or whole-spike XBB.1.5 booster vaccines were compared with those after a third dose of ancestral spike booster vaccine. Fold-improvement over ancestral vaccine was just 1.3 for the whole-spike XBB.1.5 vaccine, similar to data published using human serum samples. In contrast, the fold-improvement achieved by the RBD-TM XBB.1.5 vaccine was 16.3, indicating that the RBD-TM vaccine induced the production of antibodies that neutralize the XBB.1.5 variant despite previous exposure to ancestral spike protein.

Indexed as

anchored RBD vaccineCOVID vaccineimmune imprintinglipid nanoparticlemRNA vaccinevirus neutralization

Identifiers

PMID39687732
PMCPMC11646785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.